User:Leahcormier/Coordinated management of meaning/Hencatalan Peer Review

General info
Leahcormier
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Leahcormier/Coordinated management of meaning
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The lead does a good job of explaining what the theory is in a clear and concise way. It accurately introduces the important figures that developed the CMM theory.

Article Body Content

The information presented in the body succeeds at further explaining the theory and how it connects to study of communication. The direct connection to interpersonal relationships helps the reader understand what area of communication study the theory falls within.

Tone and Balance

The theory is presented from an unbiased perspective and does not favor any specified position.

Sources and References

The source used is reliable and accurately supports the topic of the article.

Organization

The grammar of the article could be changed slightly, the first sentence of the body feels awkward to read. This could be fixed by replacing a few words and shifting the punctuation.

Overall Impressions

Overall the article does well at introducing the theory. There is no link to an existing article so I am assuming it is an entirely new article that is being created. As such, I feel the article could benefit from more sources and references to expand the explanation of the theory. Studies that provide evidence of behaviors that support the theory, or use the theory as a foundation to explore its application in the field, would improve the articles comprehensiveness.