User:Leahyaa/Slendertail lanternshark/NAM2301 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

3/27/2023: The writing in the Slendertail lanternshark is concise in an effective manner. Ambiguous information such as the conservation status of the organism is presented in a neutral manner, adhering to the guidelines of wikipedia. I think the article would, however, benefit from a greater level of description of the organism. With the image supplied being of pickled organisms and there not being any physical description, the reader is left feeling unfamiliar with the organism and unable to identify it. Getting pictures of rarer organisms is difficult, especially of deep sea organisms in their natural habitat, but if such an image cannot be obtained, then describing coloration, bodyshape, and the patterning of bioluminescence would be a great addition to it.