User:Leamanda/Community health centers in the United States/Kavnaulakh Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I will be reviewing Amanda's work (user: Leamanda)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Here is the current link to the material I will be reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Leamanda/Community_health_centers_in_the_United_States?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Here is the link to the current version of the article: Community health centers in the United States

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content added by Amanda is very relevant to the topic at hand. Addressing the funding of the community health centers adds to the discussion of the history of these centers. A timeline is provided as it progresses with detail from 2010 to 2018. The added information also provides a neutral point of view without showing any sign of bias. It's entirely just facts laid out in a timeline. There is also adequate sources provided for the information that is provided.

Amanda also added the section about Asian Health services. I particularly enjoy the section about Oakland. The information is relevant. However, I do wonder if it may be too specific. This article is about the US as a whole, so to have some examples limited to the Bay Area may be seen as not as relevant to some. I am currently struggling with the same issue. The sections about the Asian Health SErvices Youth Programs are also very relevant and fill a gap in the community health centers available for Immigrants. Same with project revive. All these additions for the Immigrants and community Health centers sections contain adequate, up to date, relevant sources and are all properly listed below.

For all the writing, the organization is well laid out, grammar proper, and sentence structure makes sense. Overall, I see no issues with this, and it makes a great addition to the article as a whole.