User:Leamanda/Health status of Asian Americans/Kavnaulakh Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Reviewing Amanda's work (User: Leamanda)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to draft i am reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Leamanda/Health_status_of_Asian_Americans?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to current version:
 * Health status of Asian Americans

Evaluate the drafted changes
Amanda has added the the grassroots movement section through a subsection called Community-based participatory research, as well as the Peer-to-peer education section. These two sections provide content that is very relevant to the topic and adds to the section side of our assignment. Given that content is more about methodologies, it does not include things like dates. However, looking through the sources, it is all up to date. This definitely fills in some of the gaps that exist in this grassroots movements section. These sections have a lot of room for potential bias, however Amanda does a good job at maintaining a neutral tone throughout the writing, keeping the facts well laid out throughout. All Amanda's content is backed up with reliable sources and the content of the sources all reflect what has been added. The links all work as well. The language used in the article is clear and articulate, and is free of error or confusing organization. The image added does kind of add to the idea of peer to peer. However, I think the article could also suffice without, as the image is pretty simple. But I don't think it hurts to have it, especially considering the caption makes the image make perfect sense. And I do believe that the image respects the copyright rules Wikipedia has in place.