User:LeanneGagnon/Evaluate an Article

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate because it is a C rated article that needs editing based on the talk page. The article also is a main topic in my class.

Evaluate the article
The intro sentence seemed clear, but rather than a just defining what surveillance capitalism is, the sentence also contains the view point of an author who wrote a book about it.

The lead section is overly detailed.

The content in the article is relevant to the topic, but there is information that is not needed.

The article is not neutral.

There are claims that appear biased.

It is not concise and easy to read.

There are no images.

The talk page indicates that the article is not of good quality.

The history page shows many edits.

There are many different sources and all of the links worked. One link led me to a site in another language that I think was Dutch. I can't say if it was a credible source as I can't read Dutch.

The sources were credible and did reflect that info from different points of view were used such as Doctorow and Zuboff.

The article is and has been since day one, a C rated article.

The article was difficult to follow. It was very wordy and may have too much vocabulary for someone unfamiliar with the topic. It would require a lot of additional reading to totally understand what a lot of the content means.