User:Lee3629/Air conditioning/TheA04 Peer Review

General info
Lee3629
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lee3629/Air conditioning
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Air conditioning

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.


 * A lead section - (already in the article)
 * A clear structure - The parts added are clear and fit well in the structure of the paragraphs. More information was provided in terms of the history of the Air Conditioner, as well as additional information regarding health and economic advantages.
 * Balanced coverage - The article prior to editing did not have any information regarding the impact that was created due to air conditioners in terms of health, economic, or environmental impacts. The additional information provided, spreads the article out from just information on air conditioners to the social impacts of the air conditioner.
 * Neutral content - The article overall has a neutral tone, and the text added reflects that nicely. When discussing Health effects the overall tone is a bit more positive, while the environmental impacts are in a more negative tone, but not to the point where the message of the text is discredited. However, in the Economic effects section, there is a paragraph at the end that does not have any particular connection to the rest of the previous information.
 * Reliable sources - The sources from the Bibliography appear to be reliable sources, mostly fact based, and often from governmental sources.