User:Leex8420/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Ecosystem service

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I thought it was important for the general public to have a good explanation and basic understanding of this information. My immediate impression was that it seems very accessible and easy to understand, with links to explanations for words that are not inherently obvious.

Evaluate the article
Lead section - broad information with definition links highlighting the most basic and important info that a non scientist could understand

Content - definitely needs some explanation for words like carbon sequestration, otherwise interesting info, really like the examples section,

Tone & Balance - seems to be well balanced, discusses the value of all opinions when making decisions in ecosystem services

Sources & References - sources look good, there are plenty of them and seem to be predominantly peer reviewed articles

Organization & writing quality - a lot of information but well organized, pertinent sections

images & media - honestly, could use more images in relation to examples section but it does have a lot

talk page discussion - didn't know this existed. super cool. definitely gives more information and i think was my favorite section to read. they talk about how to amend the article/what others think

overall impression - well curated page, well organized and simply informative