User:Leezasaaed/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Water Supply and Sanitation in Latin America

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate this article because I will be volunteering with EcoSwell Peru and the particular project that I will be working on will be the water and sanitation project. This article has been very informative to me and is relevant to the work that I am doing, this is why I chose to evaluate this article specifically.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section

- The lead sentence does a very good job in clearly and concisely stating what the entire article is about.

-The lead does not include a brief description of all of the contents that the article covers.

- The lead does not include any information that is not present in the article.

- The lead is ultimately very concise and not over detailed.

Content

- The articles content is relevant to the topic.

-The content is up to date.

-There is plenty of content that is very descriptive and detailed.

- The article deals with wikipedia's equity gap; it addressing issues/topics related to historically underrepresented groups.

Tone and Balance

- The article is from a neutral point of view.

- There are no claims that seem to be heavily biased towards any position.

- There are no viewpoints that are significantly overrepresented and or underrepresented.

- This article does not try to persuade you any way; it simply gives facts from a neutral point of view.

Sources and References

-All facts are backed up by a reliable secondary source.

- The sources are thorough and they reflect the available literature on the topic.

-The sources are current.

-The sources are written by a diverse array of authors; and the links work.

Organization and Writing Quality

- The article is well written; it is clear and concise to read.

- The article does not have any grammatical errors.

-The article is well organized.

Images and Media

-The article shows a few graphs and images

-The images are well captioned

- The images adhere to WikiPedia's copyright regulations.

-The images are laid out in an appealing way.

Talk Page Discussion

- The talk page is very thorough; there are many contributions and many edits contributed by many other wiki users.

-The article is rated very well

Overall Impressions

-The articles overall status is complete and very thorough

-The strengths of the article are the clear and concise descriptions and thorough detail

-I think the article can be improved with more images

-This article is very well-developed