User:LegoOrchid/The Frogs/Hazelsvest Peer Review

General info
LegoOrchid
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:LegoOrchid/The Frogs
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):The Frogs

Lead
I'm not completely sure if you rewrote the lead in its entirety or if the lead in your draft is just an addition. I am just going to assume that you intended to keep the original lead and add yours onto it (if not, I recommend that you still keep the original intro sentence and lead as well).

I like that you added historical/military context, although its direct connection to the play is a bit unclear. Is the war/Athens' surrender to Sparta reflected in any of the themes of the play? Was it written as a response? Some additional info could make it feel a bit more relevant.

Content
You added a lot of really great and interesting content in the body of the article!

Tone and Balance
The tone is overall neutral and balanced. Some of the language feels a bit subjective in the Development in Theatre section, so just be wary of that.

Sources and References
The sources that you added look credible and reliable! Since there was a lot of information added, you could maybe even add a couple more sources in the body (if possible).

Organization
The content is well organized and well written. There is a lot of information and words on the page, and some pretty large paragraphs, which can sometimes feel overwhelming/daunting to readers. Maybe try breaking some of the info up into smaller bite sized chunks so it's easier to digest?

Images and Media
I really like that you added an image from a live performance of The Frogs! However, I'm not completely sure what the relevance of the second image you added is?