User:Legotech/archive

RfC unwarranted
That Requests for Comment statement is unwarranted. That user actually did get me to stop posting uncivil views. I am aware of this Request for Comments situation. Decimus Tedius Regio Zanarukando (talk) 11:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Help with RFC
I don't know what else to do here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Tedius_Zanarukando  I tried starting an RFC and he seemed to want to discuss things, so I was trying to help him find a better place to preach and he just goes back to preaching  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tedius_Zanarukando&diff=prev&oldid=185357991 What should I do next? It seems maybe he's not actually malicious, just misled? Legotech (talk) 06:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Have you dropped a note to User:Alison? I have a feeling that (due to past history) she might be the best one to interpret the current situation. Though I would be happy to help, if she wishes. - jc37 10:26, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, actually, I was poking around trying to see if there was anything else I could do/suggest and reread his page and dropped her a line...Thank you! Legotech (talk) 17:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok - Tedius is beyond dialog and compromise. Goodness knows, I've tried long enough. It's late here now but in the morning, I'll likely re-draft your RfC, sign it and put it live. I'll then post it prominently and invite the community to discuss it. Note that the last RfC I filed ended up going to ArbCom and an admin was de-sysopped. I've no desire to see Tedius punished in any way, nor humiliated, but he needs to stop this sexist campaign one way or another. There have been far too many complaints -  A l is o n  ❤ 06:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your help! I think you can see that I tried to reason with him...I seriously don't think he's beind malicious, but he won't see his behavior as unacceptable either...I tried to fill out the RfC myself, but wow...wikipedia is a scary place to go alone ;)Legotech (talk) 08:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * He's actually taken things further than that. See this entry on the blog you helped him set up, where you're mentioned by name. Ok - I pretty close to blocking him indefinitely but would rather defer to the community, so I'll finish the RfC you started and put it live tonight. We'll take things from there ... - A l is o n  ❤ 03:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok, at some point you just have to laugh...please let me know what you need me to do. Legotech (talk) 03:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Just sit tight for the moment, and make sure it's co-signed when it goes live ... - A l is o n  ❤ 03:33, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Zealousness
An excellent idea of yours, I concur. Never seen that template before, is it one of your own? May use it myself in future in similar situations! Kim Dent-Brown  (Talk)  18:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Not my idea at all, I discovered it while working with the missing articles project...there are some things that are in Britannica that are really nothing more than a strange word for some obscure technical/architectural/religious thing and whoever came up with that template was a genius. Thanks again for the good word...its nice to be noticed :) Legotech (talk) 18:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed merger
Please read up on proposing mergers. It's expected that when someone proposes a merger they at least say why they think it's worth discussing.LeadSongDog (talk) 23:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, just realized I didn't identify articles affected - I meant your mergers into Barbershop musicLeadSongDog (talk) 21:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Aegicrane
Another editor has added the  template to the article Aegicrane, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Affetti
Another editor has added the  template to the article Affetti, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

re: User talk:TexasAndroid
Good evening. You asked on Texas's page if you'd broken procedure on the recent edits of pages which were mere dictionary definitions. I don't mean to butt in but would like to offer you some thoughts in the hope that you can learn from my mistakes.

Using the history of Aegicrane as an example, I think that what you did was fine from Wikipedia's point of view. Once the page has been transwiki'd out, it's in our best interests to clean up the page as quickly as possible and soft-redirects do that well in my opinion. In the past, I've done exactly what you did - jump over to Wiktionary and boldly create a new entry there so that the soft-redirect has someplace to point to. I have been chastised by the Wiktionary people when I did that. Their concern is that they still have a page (with history) that's in their inbound transwiki queue. They now have a harder job getting it out of the queue and merging the history with the newly created Wiktionary page.

None of that would matter except that the terms of GFDL require us to keep the attribution history of content added to the project. When you copy-paste content, that attribution history gets lost. An admin over at Wiktionary can still do a history-merge but it's several extra steps and is a somewhat error-prone process.

The process I'm now experimenting with is to
 * 1) Tag the page for transwiki out.  (The bot usually executes the transwiki in a matter of hours.)
 * 2) Add the page to a personal list for monitoring.  (I've recently created User:Rossami/Transwiki list for the purpose.)
 * 3) Check the links in the "Transwiki cleanup" template about daily to see if the Wiktionary folks have yet moved the page from their inbound queue to an actual page.
 * 4) When it finally is, replace the page with wi and.

By the way, all my concerns about history and GFDL compliance are moot in your specific cases because you were the sole contributor at both Wikipedia and Wiktionary. My clumsy process is more suited for pages that I find which others have created.

Hope that helps. Rossami (talk) 22:07, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Barbershop music
The tuning fork and pitchpipe statements were incorrect (as well as unref'd.) It's well deleted. Barbershoppers use a pitchpipe because it's a convenient pocket sized device, but the notes on a pitchpipe are the same as on a piano. Many barbershoppers have switched to electronic "pitchpipes" that fit on a keychain.LeadSongDog (talk) 05:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! Legotech (talk) 06:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: You're faster than I am!
Hurry up! :P  WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN  aka john lennon  09:10, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Wachovia Center
The redirect you did sent it to the stadium not the skyscraper, which i started the article on. Can you get rid of it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alaskan assassin (talk • contribs) 03:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Wachovia Center
Nope thats in Winston Salem (where i live). Thats about 100 miles north. I'm talking about this one.http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=1wachoviacenter-charlotte-nc-usa

Help!
I don't know what you think, but could you help save one Wachovia center from deletion?Alaskan assassin (talk) 00:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Why do the Las Vegas area casinos say they are in Paradise, Nevada?
If that is the guideline then why don't the Orlando resorts state the specific city that they are in? 74.163.224.123 (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * If you look at the category Category:Casinos_in_Las_Vegas, you'll see that regardless of the casino's mailing address, they're still listed as being in Las Vegas for sake of the category. If this is not what you are looking for, then you will need to be more specific with your question. I also recommend that if you have a specific question that it is better to ask it on a single appropriate page rather than to post the same question on multiple user's talk pages. SpikeJones (talk) 19:02, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Next time read the question. I didn't ask about a category. Read the 1st sentence in all the Las Vegas area casinos articles, they all say in Paradise, Nevada. 74.163.224.123 (talk) 19:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Infobox WoT detainees
Greetings!

I saw you added Infobox WoT detainees to some articles. I too have been adding this template. I think I still have things to learn about using infoboxen. But I have started to use Birth date, Death date and Birth year and age.

Instances of these templates embed named fields in the HTML the page generates that let robots read the birth and death information automatically -- which seems like a really good idea to me. I noticed you weren't using them, so I thought I would let you know about them.

I use the firefox browser, and I use firefox "add-on" called "clippings". It lets you maintain a tree of your most commonly used phrases to paste in. I have close to a hundred clippings now. These templates are among them, so it is really easy to instantiate. Very handy. I'd go nuts without it now.

The Birth year and age template takes one argument, the year, after the pipe symbol. The other two templates take three numeric arguments, year, month, and day.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 17:38, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * P.S. If you have tips, or comments, about Infobox WoT detainees don't hesitate to pass them on to me.


 * I have been wondering whether this box should have some more fields, or whether their should be a companion infobox for WoT suspects who remain at large... Geo Swan (talk) 17:38, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

I have so little clue about how templates work that I am probably the last person to ask :) Is there a way to embed tho birth and date bits into the template?  LegoTech &middot;(t)&middot;(c) 17:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * If you are using the firefox browser instead of internet exploder, then installing the add-on takes about one minute. Here is the link to the clippings addon....


 * Three of the clips I saved, and have ready to paste, are

and   and '''
 * }
 * So, I paste in the WoT box, figure out if we just know the year of birth, or if we know the actual date, then paste in the appropriate birth-date template. There is some documentation that shows the details of what kind of HTML the  templates generates.  Do you speak HTML?  The language we write wiki pages in is a "markup language".  So is HTML.  When we save a wikipedia page the wikipedia translates it into HTML.


 * HTML looks opaque. But you can start to use it, by learning some of its simplest markup tags, without learning the whole thing.   is the tag for a paragraph break.  is for a simple line break.  and are the matching tags you use to enclose text you want to strikeout like this.


 * Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 05:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Wow, I think you'll understand if I don't install something suggested by a random guy on the 'net who evidently thinks I'm a moron by the way he is talking down to me. It is not my job to fix your template. If it is not ready for use by the public, then perhaps you need to take it down until it is. Templates are supposed to make things easier. I won't bother with your template any longer.  LegoTech &middot;(t)&middot;(c) 09:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


 * My apologies if you thought I thought you were a moron.


 * It is not my template. I didn't create it.  I haven't modified it.


 * I used your question to gauge how to respond to you. "...embed tho birth and date bits..." -- this didn't make sense to me.  To me, it looked like an honest question from someone inexperienced.


 * I never think someone is a "moron" because there seems to be something they don't seem to know.


 * What I thought I was offering you was an honest answer to an honest question, gauged to what I honestly thought was the level of technical sophistication you seemed to be presenting. Let me suggest that rather than be offended you could choose to laugh this off as a simple, honest, well-intentioned misunderstanding.


 * Have a nice day. Geo Swan (talk) 21:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)