User:Leigh.pfeiffer/sandbox

Article Evaluation:First five-year plan First five-year plan


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Overall I found that the article stayed on topic and explored, at least shortly, most aspects of the FYP. I do wish that the section titled "Rapid growth of heavy industry" was slightly more broken up. I found the one very large paragraph daunting and difficult to read-- though that is manly due to my dyslexia.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * for continuity I wish that the "Legacy" section had a link to an article about the 2nd FYP. So that the reader could travel to it to see how the government ideal progressed.
 * What else could be improved?
 * I would like the "legacy sections subsections to be a bit more flushed out. IE: having examples with links to the Wiki articles of the silent films that came to be in this time. I feel like it would make the article more well rounded and complete.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * i found this article neutral. There are sections for both the successes and failures of the FYP.
 * Are there viewpoints that are over-represented, or underrepresented?
 * I don't believe so.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * All the citations and wiki links I checked worked. And the citations did support the article.
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There are conversations on this topic aimed to make sure the voice stays neutral and that all sides of the FYP are spoken about and represented in a fair and neutral way.
 * there are also conversation on additional sources that could be used to enhance the article.
 * There is also a conversation from an earlier group from this class! :)
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * This article is start-class and low-importance . It is also apart of the wikiproject Russia.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * There was an interesting section on prisoner labor that i want to diver further into. If this was widely spoken of in the reading I missed it. but it is a concept that interests me.

Overall I found that this page was unbiased -- though I believe after reading the talks that there are some subjects i would need to research further to see if they should be delved into further. I found that the sources, at least the ones i checked were documents well and not plagiarized. I do wish that some sections were more divided for easier reading and that others provided more resources for the reader to explore. Such as adding some links to the pages for the scilent moves that were created in this time in the :legacy" section of the page. I can see how this page could improve but I think it is still very strong.