User:Leilachabane/Abdullah Qureshi/Austinmcbride24 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Leilachabane


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Leilachabane/Abdullah_Qureshi/Bibliography?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

- The lead is concise and written very closely.

- Ideally a box would appear that sorts out all your different sections (it did with mine automatically... I think it has to do with what font you use for headers.

- I would consider making the lead shorter, after all it needs to be a short intro for someone to get a quick understanding of this person.

Content:

- The content that is provided is relevant and up to date, there is no missing or extra content.

- The content also deals with Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone

- The tone is neutral and does not seem to favor any side

General

- This author seems to meet the notability requirements

- I would check to see if "queer" should be capitalized. I know there are discussions on capitalizing certain words like "Black", but I've never seen "queer" capitalized, and I'm wondering if the wikipedia people will flag that as an error.

- I may also be unaware of how this system works, but I believe the bibliography should be a separate link than sandbox but it was all in one right here? Anyways it was helpful because I got to see why you chose your sources and they were good but just make sure things are sorted out when you truly publish.