User:Lemon517/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Aubrey Burl

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I want to learn about the background about a typical archaeologist.

Evaluate the article
The article's introductory sentence fully describes what it is about. The lead section is concise and highlights some of the prominent achievements of the subject. The article's content is mostly related to the topic; however, there are a few sentences which are off topic. For example, while addressing Aubrey Burl's view on bluestones, others' opinions are brought up. Moreover, the article, which is neutral, is supported by current and reliable secondary source of information. Nonetheless, the article is a hard read, as it lacks interesting details and utilizes much jargon. It does not include images to assist the reader's understanding of the topic. Overall, the status of this articles was once proposed for deletion as it is hard to interpret, off topic, and short. As a result, this article is underdeveloped. Thus, one way to improve it would be to rewrite it in an easy-to-read manner and delete the details that are not about the topic. Also, one can lengthen the article to provide more details about the topic.--~