User:Lemoneww/Broken windows theory/Eternitygxrl Peer Review

So far, this contribution to the article seems to have a really great start! It is well written and formatted nicely as well. There is even the use of three, seemingly reliable and current, sources of information. The only change that I could propose is that, at least on my end, the citations for these sources seem to be formatted incorrectly, creating an error message. I had the same issue when I was building my bibliography, so it is nothing to stress over, but when the time comes to add your contributions to the article, you may want to make sure that the citations are not creating this error message as other users might remove it. As far as the content goes, I do think that this would add something to the article as case studies are always helpful in understanding certain concepts, especially a theory like this article is reviewing. Furthermore, these case studies seem to be relevant and from reliable sources, which I believe would constitute an improvement to the article itself. Overall, great job so far!

General info
Lemoneww
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lemoneww/Broken_windows_theory:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_windows_theory:

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)