User:Lemurcat111/Kleroterion/Epichippo Peer Review

General info
Lemurcat11
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lemurcat111/Kleroterion
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Kleroterion
 * Kleroterion

Evaluate the drafted changes
The Lead Section

I really like how in detail the lead section is, and how there was the first couple sentences to provide what the kleroterion is. The only thing I would potentially change within the lead, is to clean up some of the verbiage to make it a little bit easier to read, specifically the part that says, "to select citizens to the boule, to most state offices, to the nomothetai, and to court juries." I would use more laments terms, but either than that, I really like the change from the original article to your draft!

Clarity of Article Structure

The article structure all makes sense to me! It's nice how there's a section before the kleroterion, and the first activity that used it, and the procedure as to how it was used. It seems very chronological.

Coverage Balance

Overall, the balance of coverage is pretty good! I think it would be cool to add a section that talks about what was used after the kleroterion since there's section for the before, and during the use of it. I think it would round it out nicely to show what came after!

Content Neutrality

It seems very neutral and not a bias toward this object!

Sources

It looks like there is a good mix of college/university level sources as well as other online sources! I definitely think there could be a few more sources to round out the article, when there are paragraphs of information with only one source, but that is my only critique. Everything else looks good!