User:Leonchan415/sandbox

Week 1

helloworld

Week 2

Article: Food Microbiology Yes, each fact in the article is referenced with appropriate and reliable references.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?

Most information in the article is relevant to topic; however, the section "food authenticity" should be expanded.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

The article appears to be neutral; no specific biases toward pros or cons of food microbiology.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

Some of the information come from scholarly reviewed scientific articles. Yes, these are neutral sources.
 * Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

The viewpoint in "food authenticity" is underrepresented.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

All of the links work and there are no close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?

The information is dated.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?