User:Leonfitz1779/Great Mosque of Kufa/Ptcoyle17 Peer Review

General info
(@LeonFitz1779)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Great Mosque of Kufa:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Leonfitz1779/Great_Mosque_of_Kufa?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Leonfitz1779/Great_Mosque_of_Kufa?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template:

Lead
You have a very nice lead into your article update by getting straight into the physical features of the Great Mosque of Kufa. I think this is very good information for your lead but could have been the second sentence after a more generally description such as location or time of being built. Very strong opening overall though as it is packed with lots of good information retainting to your topic.

Content
You have great content in the article you edited. Giving the reader information such as "The present-day mosque has four minarets" and "The shaft of a column standing next to the maqam-Nabī, located in the courtyard, and two capitals decorated with acanthus leaves re-employed at the sides of a door seemed to be related to this earlier phase " is very important and overall great content.

Tone and Balance
In your article you stick strictly to facts and present the information in a non bias manner. You give the reader only truthful and greater agreed upon facts.

Sources and References
The source you referenced in your article by Max Van Berchem seemed to be a very reliable source containing a lot of information that you used in your edit. To help strengthen your information you could include another reliable source that will make you even more reputable.

Organization
You edit is short yet contains a lot of information which generally means it's well organized, which is true for you as well. You could potentially add some simple filler information in my opinion though so it does not seem to be a list of features but the history and significance as well.

Overall
Overall this is a very good addition to this wiki article that benefits it all together. I would not say there are any problems at all just adjustments that could potentially make it even better!