User:Ler93/sandbox

This is my Sandbox. This is a practice page. I am practicing using bold. I will also link to this article about the word bold. And here is another article about the word bold, but this link redirects to a page about boldness.

Article Evaluation (Article: Social Work)

Evaluating Content - Everything in this article appears to be relevant to the topic. - The information is up to date, but in the section "Fictional Social Workers In Media," the dates of the media listed only date as far as 2016. - More current (2018) information could be added about current events.

Evaluating Tone - `The tone of this article appears to be neutral, and there don't seem to be any particular viewpoints so I can't say if they over or under-represented.

Evaluating Sources - The links in the references that I clicked on were valid and linked to appropriate pages. Something that surprised me was the large number of different things referenced. This is a hallmark of a good page since there are so many different sources of information and it's not all from the same source.

Checking The Talk Page - Something that noticed in the talk page was the input from social workers or people currently studying to become social workers. They seem interested in contributing their own specific knowledge of field of interest to the page. - The article was a nominee for a "Good Articles" category in 2008. It is a level-4 vital article, although it is not clear what that ranking means.