User:Lestermaupoy1/sandbox

Article Evaluation (Human Geography)

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * The references that are incorporated into the article is highly relevant because all of them discuss parts of the article. There were no particular parts that distracted me. The article compellingly tied the articles referenced giving it a more informational article.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * I didn't notice any information that is out of date. The whole article completely has parts that talks about human geography.
 * What else could be improved?
 * There are things that could be improved such as editing the information that is incorporated into the History section. Even though, there are information that deeply talk about the history of geography -- human geography, some takes away the purpose of the article to be informational.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is neutral. I didn't notice any heavily biased position in the article, which shows a great article.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * All the viewpoints that are discussed are fairly represented. I didn't read any overrepresented or underrepresented viewpoints.


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * After checking the citations, they do work and they are cited correctly and fairly throughout the article. The articles referenced supports clearly what the article is about.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * As I was checking the fact that are referenced in the article, they were facts that came from organizations and highly reliable researched sources. I didn't see any sources referenced that were highly biased. They were most likely neutral sources that presents facts.

Talk Page:


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * The common topic of conversations in the talk page is about how to incorporate informations and things that concerns the references and links in the article.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * The article is rated as a level 5 article. It is part of the WikiProject Geography.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * Wikipedia discusses the topic in a very neutral way. In compare to the class, the class somewhat shows a bias unlike in wikipedia, where it is more informational that an opinion article.