User:Lethe/supports


 * 1) Support.  Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 06:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Support. Great guy to have around. Dmharvey 06:53, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. Always polite. Will make a great admin. Fropuff 08:07, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Support --Terence Ong 09:56, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Support Astrotrain 10:01, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Support Proto t c 10:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Support seems good.  Grue   10:23, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Support, why not? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 10:30, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Support. From experience. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 11:08, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Support --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 13:04, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) support - definitely - William M. Connolley 13:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Support. —Kirill Lok s hin 14:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Support, I like him. - Phædriel ♥ tell me - 14:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) Support, everything looks good to me. - Bobet 14:59, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) Support our maths experts, on whom I rely to make numbers make sense. Xoloz 16:54, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) Support, of course. Fredrik Johansson - talk - contribs 17:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 17) Support. What I've seen from him in my short time here leaves me with nothing but good impression. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 19:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 18) Support - solid, diplomatic. --- --- Charles Stewart(talk) 19:59, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 19) Support. Seen this user around, a good impression. enochlau (talk) 22:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 20) Support. No reason to expect any misuse of the extra buttons. Zocky | picture popups 23:32, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 21) Support Good contributor, no evidence of problem behavior. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 00:54, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 22) Support. Took a good look and found nothing in his edit history to indicate he wouldn't be a responsible admin.-- Dakota ~  ε  01:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 23) Support--Ugur Basak 03:07, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 24) Support, clearly an excellent editor. Chick Bowen 05:05, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 25) &#8212;Charles P. (Mirv) 17:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 26) Support &mdash; Paul August &#9742; 22:01, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 27) Support, but I forgot why. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 22:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This is an odd support vote. What does it mean?  Maybe it means you recognize the name, but don't recall from where.  I can say the same thing about the name Radiant, I think. -lethe talk 23:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Lol. Have you forgotten the meaning of your own username? Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 23:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, duh! I guess I did.  -lethe talk 23:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * For people who don't know what these two are talking about, see here. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:51, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per all of above, pettiness of opposition, and excellent choice of username :) . Ncsaint 00:18, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) King of All the Franks 02:01, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. Pschemp | Talk 13:01, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Support. linas 14:25, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Support, of course. - Mailer Diablo 17:42, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Support has sufficient experience └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 19:35, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Support absolutely --rogerd 03:34, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Support --Bling-chav 13:18, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 9)  ε  γκυκλοπ  αίδεια  *  14:58, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Support. Mushroom 10:57, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Support: --Bhadani 15:42, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Support, unlikely to abuse admin tools. Christopher Parham (talk) 21:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Support, a good editor. Ashibaka tock 01:37, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) Support, good editor. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-29 01:57Z 
 * 15) Support. Seems like he will use the tools wisely. -- DS1953 talk 02:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) Support - This Wikipedian knows what "being bold" means, and consistently steers clear of "being reckless". Wonderful person to work with. --HappyCamper 17:06, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 17) Support. I'm around less, but my vote still counts.--CSTAR 18:29, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 18) Support –Joke 02:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 19) Support Expensivehat 02:18, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 20) Support Exemplary RFA candidate. --Madchester 03:42, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 21) Support based not on edit count but rather on contributions, answers to questions below, and the faith that other users I trust place in him as shown above above.   &hArr;    | | &oplus; &perp; (t-c-e) 07:17, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 22) Support - Very impressive editor and very thoughtful answers to questions, like what I've seen of his work, and I do not think all admins need to be AfD voters on every case. ++Lar: t/c 23:23, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 23) Moral support, mostly to get to be the 50th vote, but also because of the user's history of intelligent, reasoned edits. :) Matt Yeager ♫ ( Talk? ) 23:48, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 24) Support most definitely. &mdash; Laura Scudder &#9742; 02:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 25) Just-under-the-buzzer-Support as a very knowledgeable editor, and one who won't abuse the tools. I've seen his helpful edits all over the place at the math reference desk. --P e ruvianLlama(spit) 07:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 26) Support No problems here. One with Her 07:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 27) Support Joanofanarchy 08:04, 31 January 2006 (UTC)