User:Lettucesmith/sandbox/sandbox

Collaborative Planning Critiques

Tewdwr-Jones and Allmendinger believe the theory, practice and values of collaborative planning are idealist and utopian. They question whether reaching consensus is possible or positive when there are many viewpoints in the planning process and when bringing unsolved issues to court can force consensus. CP is so focused on process, that the real work practice does not achieve results.

They claim this goal ignores the complex reality of the planning process, especially a process that operates without a planner in an expert role. Without an expert, they question who decides which voices will be included in the process. They see collaborative planning as ignoring the human nature of individuals to come into the process with their own goals, values and level of social skills. They also question what will keep individuals or a organizations with similar goals from manpulating the process to reach their own goals, knowing consensus must be reached. Or, whether they can avoid the whole process and simply involve themselves in a legal process at the end. If this is the case, why should individuals become involved at all, especially given that many collaborative planning process have not result in outcomes. Need to see change beyond planning system to larger political and institutional spheres.

They also find that although collaborative planning wants to break out away from prescriptive mind sets and forcing people into beliefs, but in order to participate, actors must accept the collaborative planning values. They also do not detail what will happen when a planner or participants do not share the values or goals of collaborative planning. Are they able to participate?

Using critiques of *neoliberalism,* Mark Purcell argues that collaborative planning is a way to keep larger political and institutional systems the same while creating a process that seems to better represent the public. Mark Purcell argues that is keep neoliberals in power and keeps the political system stable.

*********

Links: The chain button allows you to link your text. Highlight the word, and push the button. VisualEditor will automatically suggest related Wikipedia articles for that word or phrase. This is a great way to connect your article to more Wikipedia content. You only have to link important words once, usually during the first time they appear. If you want to link to pages outside of Wikipedia (for an "external links" section, for example) click on the "External link" tab.

Cite: The citation tool in VisualEditor helps format your citations. You can simply paste a DOI or URL, and the VisualEditor will try to sort out all of the fields you need. Be sure to review it, however, and apply missing fields manually (if you know them). You can also add books, journals, news, and websites manually. That opens up a quick guide for inputting your citations. Finally, you can click the "re-use" tab if you've already added a source and just want to cite it again.
 * Bullets: To add bullet points or a numbered list, click here.
 * Insert: This tab lets you add media, images, or tables.

Ω The final tab allows you to add special characters, such as those found in non-English words, scientific notation, and a handful of language extensions.