User:LeuIleAsnAspSerAlaTyr/Fred Nalugoda/Globe17 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? User LeuIleAsnAspSerAlaTyr
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:LeuIleAsnAspSerAlaTyr/Fred Nalugoda

Lead evaluation
I think the lead has a good start and gives a general overview of the article. In the last sentence, I don't think it would hurt to mention the name of the research station he is the Program Director of. The way it is worded right now is a little vague and I wasn't sure if you were referring to RHSP there or something else. Also the first sentence mentions "other social issues" that he researches, but that was only briefly mentioned in the very last sentence of the article, so I think it would be helpful to expand more on that in the "Research Interests" section, if possible.

Content evaluation
The content is relevant and this seems like a really good start to the article. I don't know if there is enough information to make the second section on RHSP its own article, but that may be something to consider. I think it might be helpful to expand on the last section, if possible, and talk more in depth about his research or how it was used to implement control programs or something. I know it is difficult to start a new article and figure out what information to put in so I think this article is well done.

Tone and balance evaluation
This is a pretty factual article and really doesn't have any bias undertones. The only thing that may be perceived as bias is in the lead saying "He has been integral..." (integral according to who?), but I could also be reading too much into that. The rest of the article is really just stating facts, like his research interests.

Sources and references evaluation
It looks like there is a good variety of sources that are reliable (graduation lists, publications he is an author, etc.). The links all work and the sources are up-to-date with the knowledge of the topic. The second section doesn't have any citations so it is unclear where that information came from.

Organization evaluation
Overall the article is well-written. In the lead, two of the sentences start with "He has been", so I think maybe rewriting one of those sentences would be more engaging (although I know as a draft I tend to have a lot of similar sentence structure as well). Under the first section, RHSP is mentioned for the first time without much context, but I think it might be helpful to write the full name out with RHSP in parenthesis afterward because when I first read it I was confused what that was. The first sentence of the last section is confusing and I wasn't quite sure what that sentence was trying to say. The article is well-written though and I think the organization is appropriate.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
No images added.

New Article Evaluation
The article has a variety of sources and is notable.It is similarly structured to others that I have seen. In the last section, there are citations in the middle of a sentence, but I'm not sure if they should all just be listed at the end of the sentence or the way you currently have them. There are no links to other articles but I think it would be helpful to add some (maybe a link to Makerere University or if he worked with someone that has an article).

Overall evaluation
I like that you've begun a new article and it is well done. There is a good amount of information about him in this. I think it would be beneficial to expand on the last section if possible and go into more depth about his research and link this to other pages so it can be easier to find. You have a good variety of sources and you don't use one more than the others which shows that there is a lot of information and this is a good article to create.