User:Leutha/Archive 2 (August 2010)

License tagging for Image:Sit Times No.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sit Times No.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

WOAD Ode
Hi! You seem to have some interest in this. Do you have a validated copyright date? Pustelnik (talk) 03:07, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Invitation to vote
You as someone who participated in the editing of English people article might be interested in taking part in this discussion. Feel free to state your opinion. M.V.E.i. 16:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Leonid Savin
Did you start that page? Its ussuall etiquette to notify authors if pages are being deleted. I was dispaointed to see Apartment Fest go but the journalist Cynthia Carr who wrote about them in 'On the Edge' remains. Paki.tv 07:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Stub categories
Hi Harrypotter. WP:WSS has so far tried to avoid ethnicity-based stub templates and I feel that such a categorization is a step in the wrong direction, but that is my take on it. However, the reason I'm writing this post is that your project seems to consistently hardcode stub categories into articles. Please stop doing this, it makes our stub sorting work impossible. Instead, add the relevant stub template to the article(s). The templates are designed to sort articles into the associated stub categories automatically, but please don't add the actual stub category (e.g. ) into the articles. Doing so breaks our stub sorting work to pieces. Happy editing. Valentinian T / C 21:23, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Anti-anarchism nominated for deletion
I have nominated the article anti-anarchism for deletion. Since you spent some effort expanding the article, I'm interested in your opinions on what should be done with it. Regards, Skomorokh  incite 13:52, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of New Lettrist International
An article that you have been involved in editing, New Lettrist International, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/New Lettrist International (2nd nomination). Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 21:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Statoid
An editor has nominated Statoid, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Tatar Union of the Godless
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tatar Union of the Godless, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Tatar Union of the Godless. SJK (talk) 19:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Gordon Tait
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gordon Tait, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Gordon Tait. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Edzell
Thanks, glad you like it! No, I don't recall that they do mention if Schaw went to Uraniborg, it was really only mentioned in relation to Edzell, but Schaw is certainly discussed elsewhere. I don't have the book to hand, Its in my local library - next time I go I shall check. As you have noticed, its up for GA review, I'd be really grateful if you could improve it any more, or at least keep an eye on the page in case you can address any comments that come up with regard to Rosicrucianism etc, as that side of things is a bit outside my scope of knowledge. Kind Regards, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 15:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Sure enough, the GA comments are back (see the talk page), and some realte to these aspects. I think I am muddling up Hermeticism, Rosicrucians and Freemasonry? If you get a few spare minutes, could you take a look? Regards, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 09:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I checked in Glendinning et al's book, and it doesn't mention Schaw in relation to Uraniborg, it only says that James VI visited. Regards Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 11:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Broke Hall
A tag has been placed on Broke Hall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mspraveen (talk) 09:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi there! The article, in itself, is very small and also does not cite any references. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may try to address these aspects while you put a template on the article page. I hope this helps. Cheers! Mspraveen (talk) 09:19, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Leonid Savin
An article that you have been involved in editing, Leonid Savin, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Leonid Savin (2nd nomination). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Eiland (talk) 14:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Repost of Leonid Savin
A tag has been placed on, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Leonid Savin is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Leonid Savin saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions.  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 15:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of David Zolotarev
A tag has been placed on David Zolotarev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. llamadog903 (talk) 21:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

David Zolotarev is restored
Hello! I am happy to report that David Zolotarev is back on Wikipedia. Feel free to edit and expand the article as you see fit. And in future, always keep a copy of whatever you write -- you don't want to go through this again! Be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Hello, again! I wanted to share this with you:

Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 03:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey, it was my pleasure. I have a huge interest in this subject and I enjoyed resurrecting the article. Stay in touch and let me know if I can ever be of further assistance. Ecoleetage (talk) 20:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Tell ya what -- start the article offline, then email it to me by way of Wikipedia (I am email enabled), and I can add or expand on it. We can bang it out, have it properly referenced, and then put it up.  Always remember: never post an unfinished or incomplete article as your new offering -- not everyone has esoteric academic interests!

TWT
Your ref didn't actually support the statement about the company producing TWTs, so I removed it again. If you'd like to find some info about who actually did deliver TWTs, that might be of interest. Dicklyon (talk) 04:41, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Your references to EEV and Feranti are a bit UK-centric. There were also several U.S. companies producing TWTs in the sixties (Hughes, RCA, Westinghouse, Watkins-Johnson, among others). The Tube Guys is a new book that tracks the history of major tube companies. I'll try to add more info on this at some point. Willus (talk) 18:11, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Rudolf Rocker
Hi. As I wrote in my edit summary, gentile has several meanings. Non-Jew, on the other hand, has only one.

If you feel strongly about it, put "gentile" back. I won't change it again. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 00:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:LiegnitzRA.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:LiegnitzRA.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 18:03, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Viktor Nogin
Just curious why you removed the Persondata metadata section from the Victor Nogin article. Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 15:46, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the quick reply and restore. Cheers. Truthanado (talk) 15:55, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

my userpage
"teh" was an intentional misspelling (as was internets, as far as i'm aware it isn't a word that can be used in the plural form). In any case, could you possibly leave me a message before editing my userpage in future? At least to be polite. Ironholds 21:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 21:47, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Highgate Cemetery Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Highgate Cemetery Cover.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 14:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

London 14
Following your participation the other Sunday, you may be interested to know that London 14 is scheduled for Sunday October 12 incase you weren't already aware. Best, WilliamH (talk) 11:29, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Template:Trotskyism
I assume that your edits to this page are humourous, but you must desist. If you seriously feel that Burham or Darling are prominent Trotskists then bing some references to the Talk page. --Duncan (talk) 14:36, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Leopold Engel
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Leopold Engel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * No substantial coverage in third party, reliable sources. No "lasting and historical interest and impact" per WP:Bio

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 05:49, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Cowley Club article for deletion?
I was reading the discussion page for the LARC article where you mentioned that some geezer was proposing the Cowley Club article for deletion. I've only just found out about the said club. You may be interested to read my comments and speculation about Harry Cowley and his vigilantes on this blog (as 'ban'). Fighting Mosleyite fascists doesn't necessarily put someone in a different category from say the 43 Group who were funded by East End gangster Jack Spot. What was actually going on with rental and squatted properties, and the fruit and vegetables market too, in Brighton after WW2? Simplistic praise for Cowley as an ex-chimney sweep Robin Hood figure doesn't cut the mustard. Anyway you may find something useful in the stuff I've posted to the transpontine blog (but hey, since when was south of the river the other side?).82.153.29.32 (talk) 04:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

'Error' in registration of title regarding 62 Fieldgate Street at the Land Registry
From the LARC talk page:

(begin)

Research at the Land Registry and Companies House has shown the owner of 62 Fieldgate Street (with no charges on its title, so the asset is not mortgaged) to be Fieldgate Action Resource Centre Limited, company number 3836799, a company incorporated on 3 September 1999 which changed its name to London Action Resource Centre Limited on 5 February 2004. Curiously the number of that company as registered at Companies House is 3836099. Never mind the presence or absence of an initial 0 in the number, which relates only to the fact that Companies House uses an 8-digit number in the anticipation that all 8 will be needed some day. There seems to have been an error in the recording of the company's number when the title to the property at 62 Fieldgate was registered. There is no currently active company with the number 3836799... Explanation anyone?

(end)

Worth digging into a little bit maybe? Rising Tide UK, "Taking Action on the Root Causes of Climate Change," has hallmarks of a corporate/state-created pseudo-movement. Absolutely no shadow of a doubt about that. The climate has always changed and will always change. This is very clearly the realm of serious propaganda and manipulation. Follow the money.91.84.230.57 (talk) 10:55, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

People's comissariat's
I have renamed articles on some of the Narkomat's to People's Comissariates. It's longer, but for English-speaking people it would be more clear names.DonaldDuck (talk) 10:46, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

at a loss
I'm not sure why you've deleted my comments. Can you tell me what's bothering you, is this because I speedy tagged your article? Can we discuss this? Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 17:13, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Robert Sewell
I've formatted the disambiguation page you made at Robert Sewell, which formerly described only the historian by that name. I've also updated most of the articles linked to that page, pointing them at your new page Robert Sewell (historian). Will you be creating a page for Robert Sewell (lawyer) soon? I ask because disambiguation pages are normally used only when there are two or more articles to disambiguate. Thanks, OttoTheFish (talk) 17:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Starkey (actor)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article George Starkey (actor), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Unreferenced article flunks WP:CREATIVE. Professional George Lucas impersonator.  Tagged since 9/2007 without material improvement.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. THF (talk) 12:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikimania 2010 Gdańsk bid
Hello - I have just one question related to Wikimania 2010 Gdańsk bid. Will you be available in early March in order to take a look at the English version and polish it up? I'll be going to the hospital in the crucial days and additionally I'd love to see a native speaker of English take a look. Wpedzich (talk) 20:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello! It's Gdańsk team again. Thank you for your support way back then - we are now working hard on setting the thing up! In the meantime, could have a look at the conference overview document? We'd like to use this as the document describing our vision of the conference programme. I'd love to have our English there fixed! Please feel free to bug me (via e-mail or otherwise). Feel free to edit the page, you only need to register first (beware though: this is a non-Wikimedia wiki). « Saper // @talk »  00:21, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ken Jones (cop)
A tag has been placed on Ken Jones (cop) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Quantumobserver (talk) 01:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Precarity (eurocentric ideology)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Precarity (eurocentric ideology), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wiki-europa.info/index.php?title=Precarity. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Violation of Wikipedia license by WikiEuropa
Actually the foot is on the other boot. The Eurocentrists took the text wholesale from the old wikipedia Precarity page and pasted it on their Eurocentric site. Their page was set up on 14:45, 13 February 2008 after the above referenced page was up!!!Harrypotter (talk) 22:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ivan Teodorovich
I have nominated Ivan Teodorovich, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Ivan Teodorovich. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Carbon Rodney 09:55, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Ivan Teodorovich
Ah, thanks for notifying me - maybe I forgot to press submit the first time. Done now. If there was more to the article than a sentence I would support its inclusion but, in trying to find out anything about him, I could only find that he was indeed the Commissar for Food. However, if you have more, then please add more and I will no longer support its deletion [and also you will prove your google-fu is stronger than mine ;)]. --Carbon Rodney 10:10, 22 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I rewrote the article based on a paper encyclopedia, removing most of your references. They are still there, commented out, in the bottom of the article - please check if they are still relevant. NVO (talk) 09:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

London Meetup / Wikipedia Loves Art
Hi Harrypotter,

Unfortunately I can't come to the next London meetup - I live in Nottingham and it's a bit of a trek coming down to London on a Sunday. However, I'm very keen to capture as much feedback as possible about the WLA event - I've started a page at Wikipedia Loves Art/Feedback or you can email / Skype /IRC me if you want to talk about anything in particular. AndrewRT(Talk) 00:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

A vile right-wing racist Brit immigrant called "Rod in America"
Hi Harrypotter,

dunno whether you've seen this. I'd sussed this guy "Rod in America" out as a racist years ago. Now he's almost completely open about it. He says the "financial crisis" has been caused by "political correctness", which forced banks to lend to too many poor black people!! And apparently anyone who doesn't realise, is stupid! Up against the wall!!!

Take care,

N (ex-RM) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.120.116.146 (talk) 09:18, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * That guy Richard took it upon himself to tell me off, on the talk page for the IP address I used, for posting the above here. I then found the address had been banned, so had to set up a one-timer to respond. I might as well answer here:

''Hi Richard, I won't say thanks for your input, because that would be fake, as is the basic message of Wikipedia. As for remembering, memory doesn't come into anything here. I don't like this right-wing 'people's Establishment' (obviously fanatically brown-tonguing the real 'Establishment') ideological-lie-pushing despotic business enterprise called 'Wikipedia' one bit. And I despise the aims both of its bosses and of those who operate in its many-echeloned structure of cops - who function as officials in something a step on from (although not at all subverting, superseding, or undermining) Google. Do you get it? IBM, Microsoft, Google, Wikipedia. Even small areas of knowledge or geographical areas now have their local Wikipedia cop. Wikipedia is a technological revolutionisation of democracy and just as shitty as the political version. It is just as much, if not more so, about enclosure and banning critique of the underlying social relations, all under the headline of 'debate'. In these terrible times, it couldn't be anything else. So I won't be posting here again, or if I do it won't be to repeat the above; it will be to achieve limited aims of my own, and not from this IP. If I were to encourage you to 'remember' something... Well, no, I wouldn't bother. But if other readers of this blurb want to remember something, I'd suggest (I won't say 'please') that it could be that some people are at least a little bit sussed as to what's going on with this Wikipedia entity... Lastly, and by the way, I recall during the great miners' strike of 1984-85 that some of the striking miners used ironically to call the police the "neutrals". NPOV my arse! NPOV is a total and utter lie, and could only be a total and utter lie. Bye! N'' —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oh what a beautiful morning (talk • contribs) 15:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Meetup/London 21
We're currently debating whether or not to move it to the following weekend (not an attempt to undermine James's claim last week that we are the most established and regular meetup group, that is just an excellent side-effect) in order to allow User:Werdna and myself to attend. If you are planning on coming along then feel free to contribute to the discussion here. Thanks, ~

Ars Memorativa and 'Masonry' of the 'speculative' variety
Hi, I'm going to be doing some further work on the Art of memory article when I get through with a reorganization of the still-dangling Method of loci article. When I get to the 'Art of memory' additions I would like to add a section on the relationship between speculative masonry and the art of memory. While I do have (I think) a clear grasp of what is going on with genuine speculative masonry (as a result of my extended study of the art of memory), I don't have access to solid citations from works about Masonry that point out the relationships in a relatively unambiguous way (the nature of the subject being what it is...). You appear to have a stronger background in things 'masonic' as well as an interest in memory natural and artificial. I wonder if you might be willing to help, or at least point me to some quality publications I can mine for citations? Folks setting out from the cities of the West might appreciate at least letting the cat's tail out of the bag. Thanks! --Picatrix (talk) 09:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing me to Stevenson. Looks like he's a proper Yates fan. I'm surprised I missed his work, yet gratified he shares some of my conclusions. I had long suspected Dickson as a vector, but Stevenson seems to have connected the dots in a solid, verifiable way. By 'cross searching' Stevenson I found good material in works by Marsha Keith Schuchard and Vaughan Hart as well. I should be able to throw together something viable.


 * As for the 'lay' of the land I assume you are playing on the meaning of 'lay' as song? I doubt you'll find much that's explicit regarding 'Celtic' ars memorativa (if, indeed, anything at all), and the phrase, as you doubtless know, is attested with 'lay' as position, direction or state of the land. But I think I follow your metaphorical twist. You'll probably have luck approaching the subject indirectly through research on ritual procession, pilgrimage and pilgrims' songs. Pilgrimage routes with set rituals (involving recitation or singing) occurring at fixed points will probably be your best point of ingress. Since Latin literature on the ancient Celts is not extensive, If you are looking for possible attestations of Celtic practices of this sort you might do better to look at the ancient eastern fringe of the Celtic world (Galata, Galatians, Asia Minor, etc.) where cultural vestiges (however faint) might have been preserved in Greek or later Byzantine texts. The ginger heads had a kingdom in central Anatolia for some time... Good luck! --Picatrix (talk) 23:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

WMUK
Hi, I hear you were going to submit a membership application to WMUK. The membership form here has the address to send it on. Send me an email if you have any queries. --cfp (talk) 20:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Vladimir Viktorovich Sakharov
Hi, Harrypotter. Don't have a reference right now, but the (also uncited) Russian Wiki article I read (which actually has a much more well-developed biography of VVS than the American one) lists him as being killed by the Greens (who did participate in the Civil War in the Ukraine). But I will try looking for material to add – for sure. PasswordUsername (talk) 09:19, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Got it, Harrypotter – source already added. (I found the online HRONOS biography, which is based on a 2003 Russian-published reference book – seems reliable enough.) PasswordUsername (talk) 09:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Kunst und Natur.jpg
File:Kunst und Natur.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Kunst und Natur.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 11:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Stingo.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Stingo.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:30, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Bakunin a government agent?
Hi mate,

I saw your postings over at the Bakunin talk page and was just wondering, what evidence do you have for suggesting Bakunin was in fact in the pay of the French (Russian?) governments? Please note that I'm not intending this as a sort of aggressive question, despite having Bakuninist sympathies I'm genuinely interested in the issue and not looking for an argument. Apologies if you've included it somewhere in your writings already, as I didn't read the entire talk page.

Anyway, if you have time, I would be interested in your response.

Cheers Jonathanmills (talk) 04:46, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I'm not quite sure about the confusion between the French and Russian governments here, bearing in mind that the French government referred to here is that of Louis Blanc and other socialists who had come to power in the February Revolution. James G. Chastain discusses this in 'Bakunin as a French Secret Agent in 1848' in History Today. Billingsley suggests, somewhat ironically, that the French government paid him to go away. (see Bakunin, Yokohama, and the Dawning of the Pacific Era. I think it is quite clear that in 1848 Bakunin got backing from French revolutionaries to spread the revolution. As for Marx's suggestion he was a Russian agent, I think that has been generally dismissed. However, while in Siberia he did have a state sinecure from his cousin Nikolay Muravyov-Amursky, then the governor - but whether that makes him a government agent I'm not sure. Muravyov was a liberal and Bakunin was linked with plans to break away from the Russian empire and joining or copying the USA (Kroptkin came across traces of this years later). Myself I feel that Bakunin was a more effective revolutionary before he got bogged down with anarchism and all the ideological baggage that went with that. A little bit of first time tragedy second time farce.Harrypotter (talk) 23:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the comprehensive and illuminating reply! Yes, I must have gotten the wrong end of the stick, as I thought you were repeating the old rumour (slander?) that he was a Russian agent. Thanks for the interesting info. Jonathanmills (talk) 11:18, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Kalmykia
Hi.

I was out of the loop for QUITE some time, and I don't even remember the details of the discussion, off-hand, but when I said "outlaws" yes it was, to my knowledge a bit toward the end of the campaign ... but in regards to that I think, even from the get-go, they described us as outlaws that could be "used to their benefit" meaning we had no real place as far as they were concerned.

Anecdotally, and this is from people with second-hand information, themselves (as my father was 5 when he got to the country in 1952), the soviet campaign of genocide against the kalmyks was much worse than history describes. ... then again, when telling a story, you can exaggerate ... but my dad said it was closer to 80% of the Kalmyk population that perished. ... I like how he told it, too ... "they could haul us into cattle cars, but they could never make us weep." They just didn't believe in that. They were a strong, stoic people (I'm a sentimental sop, I guess I get that from my mom).

What are you going to do, now, eh? Every Kalmyk who can is escaping Kalmykia, the younger ones especially ... and they have sponsers in the US because of the Kalmyk community, here. I'm glad we're here, though. We finally got a piece of the pie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ironywrit (talk • contribs) 23:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Meetup
A meetup is taking place in Manchester if you are interested.  Majorly  talk  18:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

London Psychogeographical Association: A Hoax?
The phrase largely fictitious organisation seems in breach of WP:WEASEL and questions the existence of the organisation. (The article has also been tagged for weasel words since.) It thus seems reasonable to question whether the article refers to a real organisation. As for the article on psychogeography, it has been tagged for being like an essay and may contain weasel words. Autarch (talk) 08:49, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Self-published book
I'm working on compiling a book containing information about almost all Non-indigenous ethnic groups living or working in Pakistan. The population of a particular ethnic group would be obtain respectively from their diplomatic missions in Pakistan including regions with significant populations, languages spoken and religious affiliations. I'm not very good with writing so it would be great, if you would like to collaborate with me.--116.71.53.25 (talk) 06:17, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added a hangon template to an article, Zeche Carl. In order for an administrator to evaluate whether the article should be speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide reasoning, on the article's talk page, for why it should remain. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:16, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Arto Luukkanen
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Arto Luukkanen. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:14, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Yo ho ho


 Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to your friends' talk pages. PS sorry I missed the Oak, hope to be there in Jan.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  20:02, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Harrypotter! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created  are  Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current  article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Pierre Guillaume -
 * 2) Jörn Rüsen -
 * 3) John Krizanc -
 * 4) Arto Luukkanen -

National-Anarchism
I've radically improved the National-Anarchism article. Any thoughts you would like to share on its talk page? --Loremaster (talk) 17:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Leninist League (UK)


The article Leninist League (UK) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 12:37, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

change of accessdate in template on Compton Bishop
Hi, On your edit of Compton Bishop you changed accessdate to access date within the cite web template. Was this intentional as it means the date doesn't display in the reflist?&mdash; Rod talk 14:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Randy Kehler
A tag has been placed on Randy Kehler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; RHaworth 10:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Move functionality
Please use the move tab at the top of each article if you want to rename an article, rather than copying text to a new page, as with Karl Schröder, Karl Schröder I and Lewis Cohen, Lewis Cohen (mayor). Moving transfers the edit history -- the attribution required by the GFDL Wikipedia operates under. See WP:MOVE for more info, and please tag any further instances of cut & paste moves with or list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thanks, 66.57.4.150 (talk) 23:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Edit summaries
I understand you are involved in a dispute with User:Loremaster, but referring to their edits as 'vandalism' is inappropriate. Please discuss this issue on the talk page. – xeno talk 21:34, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Premature archiving of the discussion is also inappropriate. Please discuss the issues in good faith. – xeno talk 21:37, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I've replied at my talk. – xeno <sup style="color:black;">talk 22:03, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-03-26/National-Anarchism
I've familiarized myself somewhat with the issues but I'm still not sure I have time to mediate this dispute. I have requested the Mediation Cabal assist. Please see the above linked page. – xeno <sup style="color:black;">talk 01:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Lead section
Please review the above section. I would suggest developing the National-Anarchism section before trying to insert a statement into the lead that is not supported by the body of the article. – xeno <sup style="color:black;">talk 17:47, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I notice you're persisting in inserting "radical right" term into the lead when it is not supported by the body. In fact, the term "radical right" does not appear at all in the article. Please review Lead section. Failure to adhere to the guidance provided there and continuing to engage in a slow-moving edit war to insert this contrary to the guideline may be considered a form of disruptive editing. – xeno <sup style="color:black;">talk  14:52, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''This is quite inappropriate. Do not refer to your fellow editors as "the liar". One instance of deception does not a liar make. Comment on content, not contributors.'' – xeno <sup style="color:black;">talk 23:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Note
There is a thread here that may be of interest to you. Thanks, – xeno <sup style="color:black;">talk 13:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

we got a moderator http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2010-03-26/National-Anarchism PsychoActiveKineticInternational TransVersal (talk) 22:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Apology
I would like to apologise for saying that you are a partisan of the Third Position political current. I hope subsequent developments have helped you understand why I jumped to such a wrong conclusion, and understand that you have also modifed your view as regards National Anarchism.Harrypotter (talk) 15:30, 30 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Apology accepted. :) Can you please express your support for the last compromise I proposed on the Mediation Cabal page? --Loremaster (talk) 17:38, 30 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for showing your support. --Loremaster (talk) 14:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Michael Duck
I have nominated Michael Duck, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Michael Duck. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Simple Bob (talk) 01:54, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Fonthill Gigfford Church.gif
A tag has been placed on File:Fonthill Gigfford Church.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim 1357  <sup style="font-family:Times new roman; font-size:small;">talk  00:10, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

BM-WP mailout list
Dear HP,

I'm writing because you have indicated your interest in the collaboration between the British Museum and Wikipedia currently underway. Looking forward to seeing you tomorrow!

Also, if you are willing, I would like to add you to a mailout that I will be sending frequently during this month to try and keep everyone related to the project informed of all the activities underway. That way, we can as a group co-ordinate our efforts and get the best outcome in the short space of time. People on the list include wikimedians (London-based and global) and British Museum staff (Departmental contacts and individual curators). It is also a place where, if you have a request or idea you can write to me and I'll pass the information to the group. Finally, it is where any prizes that become available will be announced first.

By way of a privacy policy, I will be using blind-carbon-copy so your email address won't be published if you don't want it to be. I will only share the list of addresses with the executive of Wikimedia-UK and my supervisor within the British Museum.

Would you be happy to be added to this mailout? If so, please contact me with your email address.

Sincerely, Witty Lama 16:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedian in Residence
just saw Wikipedian in Residence... not entirely sure I think this is a good idea on a couple of grounds - not the least of which is WP:N and also a sense of "talking about ourselves"... However - good luck with the MoLDocklands idea - let me know if I can help. Witty Lama 14:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Red Army
Would you kindly please explain this diff? That particular point needs a good citation, and you removed it!! Also, please be more careful when you're splitting important pages. The conscription section of the Soviet Ground Forces remains on the Red Army page, and there are no categories added for the new Soviet Army page. Please be more systematic and careful in future. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:18, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

People's Commissar
None of them are really notable in themselves, either than to being post and most of them lack information to become FAs, or even GAs... Second, they are the same organization, just different names, meaning that having to article on the same subject, group and organization is redundant and would make some readers to believe that they were to all different entities, something they're not. --TIAYN (talk) 10:28, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Fine fine.. I must admit, I don't really care that much about this topic, I started working on it after cleaning up the Ministries of the Soviet Union article.. Question, seeing that you are more familiar with this topic in regards to the USSR, can you check for any missing ministries in the article? If so, I would greatly appreciate any help. --TIAYN (talk) 12:56, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks.. My last question, may be a hard one to answer, how was the Cabinet of the People's Commissar elected? Was the cabinet ever dissolved by the Supreme Soviet? If you have an answer, please tell. --TIAYN (talk) 17:54, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Certain accursed ones of no significance


The article Certain accursed ones of no significance has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Editor2020 (talk) 19:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:54, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Identifying reliable sources
What the heck are you talking about? I don't seem to have edited that page in over a year. --<b style="color:#3773A5;">Cyber</b> cobra (talk) 04:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC) [Please reply on my talkpage]
 * I really don't get what you're talking about. I did not edit policy, I edited the article. The article has only one reference and thus currently fails the sources (plural) part of the WP:GNG. Reliable Sources don't even factor in to this. --<b style="color:#3773A5;">Cyber</b> cobra (talk) 19:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Isle Abbots
Thanks for your edits to Isle Abbots. Some of the detail about the church might be more appropriate at Church of St Mary the Virgin, Isle Abbotts rather than the more general village article - or it could go in both.&mdash; Rod talk 15:30, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response. The church is a Grade I listed building - which is considered inherently notable by WP:HSITES etc (& have enough sources available to demonstrate notability) & I created it when changing all the red links to blue at Grade I listed buildings in South Somerset which itself is part of the wider Grade I listed buildings in Somerset which is mirrored (although less developed) for each of the counties of England. Some of the articles created as part of those hundreds of stubs created have been picked up and developed by others - often with local knowledge and interest. I also noticed the spelling variation when I contacted you - but the GI listed buildings use the titles at Images of England which are drawn from the English Heritage National Monuments Record.&mdash; Rod talk 13:17, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * As for what else could be added to the village article - WP:UKCITIES has lots of good suggestions & at WikiProject Somerset we are gradually working our way through improving the articles for settlements in the country - starting with getting those with over 5,000 population up to GA.&mdash; Rod talk 13:39, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject Philosophy
Greetings,

It seems that you've been a Wikipedian for a long time, but just formally "signed up" as part of WikiProject Philosophy just recently. I'm glad you finally made the plunge! If there is anything that I can help you with, large or small, just let me know. Although I'm sure you already know your way around. Be well, Greg Bard (talk) 23:05, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wikipedian in Residence


The article Wikipedian in Residence has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable concept: I see no evidence that this passes the notability guideline of multiple independent references to reliable sources. This is just as important for articles about Wikipedia as articles about other subjects (if not more so).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robofish (talk) 23:40, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi there - when I left the message above, this was an article in the mainspace, and I felt it didn't belong there as it didn't seem to comply with our notability requirements. It has since been moved to Wikipedia-space by User:Cybercobra (see history). It's no longer an article, so the problem raised above no longer applies - feel free to ignore it. Happy editing! Robofish (talk) 23:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Spiegel detail.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Spiegel detail.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:39, 25 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:39, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Kazan Theological Seminary
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kazan Theological Seminary, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://orthodoxwiki.org/Kazan_Theological_Academy. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:26, 28 July 2010 (UTC)