User:Levi2525

I read your article below and have a question to start my answer to the Unified field theory. What if the electron doesn't care if the proton is positive? What then? First "field" might be a incorrect term in Unified field theory. Given E=mc2 Gravity is known as a warpage of spacetime by a object that has mass. A body of significant mass warps spacetime into a gravity "well" much like a bowling ball would warp a sretched piece of faberic if the ball is placed in the middle. Gravity is not a force, it is a result of that mass in the faberic of space and time. Roll another smaller object, say a baseball, onto that faberic at its edge towards the bowling ball and the baseball will "fall" towards the gravity "well" created by the bowling ball in the middle of the faberic of spacetime. The baseball also has mass but it is only reacting to the curvature of space as it "falls" into the bowling ball's gravity well. Niether object has a gravatation force. There are no gravitrons. There is no "pull" or "attraction". There is only a gravity "well". It, the "well", just exisist for bodies in this current spacetime that has mass/matter. Its just that both objects are doing what is natural for bodies coming close to one another in the faberic of spacetime. One "falls" for the other. (I always wondered why they call it falling in love: its natural, I guess)

Magnetism: A material with an ability to "attract" metallic objects. The material has mass. The material is made of matter. It has the ability to exhibit force on another body that is metallic. It must have inherent energy to exhibit force. Remember E=mc2 The magnet does not "attract" metallic objects. There are no magnetic gravitons. There is no "pull" or "attraction". There is only a "gravity well" or curvature of space-time created by the magnet existing in this space and time. Iron filings displaying a bar magnet's lines of flux are not lines of flux, but the outline of the "gravity well" or the curvature of space-time. We can look and see in two dimensions as the iron filings are arranged about the bar magnet the actual curvature of space-time. Place a metallic object close enough to the bar magnet's wrap age of space-time and it to will "fall" in the magnet's "gravity well". If you do this experiment on a table the metallic object appears to slide across the table. It doesn't, it falls across the table in a straight line toward the "gravity well". A bar magnet in outer space and a metallic object will do the same, but it won't look very linear to us. It's relative. Why won't wood, a non-metallic object, fall towards the bar magnet yet fall into Earth's gravity well? First, for the magnet and wood; the wood or similar material does not have enough mass/matter to overcome its inertia to remain at rest. Secondarily, the wood and Earth; the Earth has the mass to overcome the woods inertia to remain at rest. A strong enough magnet should warp space-time enough so that a piece of wood would "fall" towards it. That strong of a magnet may or may not interact with the wood's atoms, yet place it in outer space and the physical warp age of space-time would be sufficient to have the piece of wood fall towards it. Again the magnet does not attract an object. It warps space-time itself.

Electricity: See magnetism. Take a steel nail, wrap wire around it, connect the wire to a power source, and it becomes an electro-magnet. A material without inherent energy for warping space-time, but is subjected to an energy source that gives it its ability to do so. Remember E=mc2 A celestial body, bowling ball, bar magnet, nails all have mass, all have the ability to warp space-time given the right amount of mass (m) or the right amount of energy (E) applied to the mass (m). Contention: How big does a body have to be to warp space-time to create a curvature in space-time "gravity well" so that a piece of metal will fall towards it the same way as the exact same piece of metal would "fall" towards the magnet or electro magnet? Maybe something on the order of 'c' squared? Experiment to the point of contention: The increase to the power applied to the electro-magnet should be proportional to the geometrical expanding lines of influence (or flux or electronic gravity well) for the electro-magnet as displayed by the iron filings. Another words for a bowling ball to move a piece of metal that a bar magnet or electron magnet could move it, the bowling ball would have to be the size of Manhattan Island. Why? Because of 'c' squared. Well I gave you the E, the m, and the 'c' squared. They are equal, not unified, as they’re dependant upon their energy mass relationship to perform a curvature of space-time.

Levi2525 PS The curvature of space-time is equal for all three given their energy mass relationships. Remember a feather and cannon ball on the moon will land at the same time when dropped from a known and equal height.

Unified field theory From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. In physics, unified field theory is an attempt to unify all the fundamental forces and the interactions between elementary particles into a single theoretical framework. The term was coined by Einstein who attempted to reconcile the general theory of relativity with electromagnetism in a single field theory. His quest proved elusive and a unified field theory, sometimes grandiosely referred to as the Theory of Everything (TOE, for short), has remained the holy grail for physicists, the long-sought theory which would explain the nature and behavior of all matter.

In physics, the forces between objects can be described as mediated by fields. Current theory says that at subatomic distances, these fields are replaced by quantum fields interacting according to the laws of quantum mechanics. Alternatively, using the picture-wave duality of quantum mechanics, fields can be described in terms of exchange particles that transfer momentum and energy between objects. Crudely speaking, objects interact as they emit and absorb exchange particles, in effect playing a subatomic game of "catch". The essential belief of a unified field theory is that the four fundamental forces (see below) as well as all matter are simply different manifestations of a single fundamental field.

A unified field theory aims to reconcile the four fundamental forces (or fields) of nature, namely:

Strong force: Force responsible for holding quarks together to form neutrons and protons, and holding neutrons and protons together to form nuclei. The exchange particles that mediate this force are gluons. Electromagnetic force: It is the familiar force that acts on electrically charged particle. The photon is the exchange particle for this force. Weak force: Responsible for radioactivity, it is a repulsive short-range interaction that acts on electrons, neutrinos and quarks. It is governed by the W boson. Gravitational force: A long-range attractive force that acts on all particles. The exchange particles have been postulated and named gravitons.