User:Lewis11coyote/User:LilMewsWorld/Joachim Koester/Lewis11coyote Peer Review

General info
LilMewsWorld
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:LilMewsWorld/Joachim Koester
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Joachim Koester

Lead

 * This article does not have a Lead implemented yet. I also did the same thing because I did not see the Lead included in the outline. Therefore, the guiding questions concerning the lead cannot be answered.

Content

 * Yes the content added is all relevant to the topic, you did a really good job going into depth about his artworks and exhibitions.
 * The content seems to be all up to date
 * I don't think that there is any information missing, the biography and education portions are concise but explain all the relevant information that is needed.

Tone and Balance

 * Yes, the content added is all neutral seeing as the facts and artworks are described just for what they are, and not the author's opinions on them.
 * No, there are no claims that appear to be heavily biased.
 * There are no viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented because all of the information is presented in a neutral way.
 * No, the content added does not attempt to persuade the reader.

Sources and References

 * Yes, all new content is backed up by a reliable source.
 * yes, upon double checking the sources, I see that they do reflect what is written in the article.
 * Yes, the sources are very thorough and reflect the available literature on the topic.
 * Yes the sources are current.
 * Although some of the same names appear frequently on the source list, it is probably because they have produced the most information on the artist and there is still a wide variation nevertheless.
 * After looking on scholarly sources and searching the name of the artist, I do not think that there are better sources that the author could have included that they did not include already.
 * Yes, after checking a few links they do work.

Organization

 * Yes, the content is concise, clear, and well written.
 * No, the content has no grammatical or spelling errors.
 * Yes, the content is divided into sections that make reading easier.

Images and media

 * There are no images in this article

Overall Impressions

 * Yes, the content has much improved the original article, it is much more complete with much more information.
 * The strengths of the content added are that it is clear, to the point, and a much more in depth look at his artwork and exhibitions. Now, if someone were to look up this artist they would actually find information put all in one place for them.
 * The only way the content could be improved is if the biography was expanded and a Lead was added to draw the reader in.