User:LexBrown070/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
G. E. M. Anscombe

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It was a piece of a larger work on Women In Philosophy. This particular woman caught my eye because she was active in Philosophy up until the year before I was born which I consider recent for Philosophical Literature.

Evaluate the article
The article seems to be well composed. The lead section is short, however, I find it to be encompassing without giving too much of the information away that will be discussed later. The content is filled with links and references which is especially included when referring to the topics previous works and the areas in Philosophy in which she focused most of her attention on. Those topics are also linked and pop up to the correct Wiki page. I find that there are both primary and secondary sources that are all reputable throughout the page. It is written in a neutral tone; even when conveying the point of some written works of the subject, it conveys what the message was and no further. There is an image of the subject which flows nicely with the rest of the page, there is also an image of texts that was referenced and the page is well organized. There is a lot of activity in the talk page and edits were taken into consideration.

The article qualifies as being well developed. Strengths are that the article seems to have little to no pieces of missing information. There is a reference to one of the books written by the subject that has no Wiki Page assigned to it and that is an area that can use some improvement.