User:Lexi2023/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Frank Gehry - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because Frank Gehry is one of my favourite architects. He's someone of great interest to me, and I feel I can always learn more about him and his work. My first impression of the article was that it has a lot of good information and pictures. I thought his bio picture could be updated since it's from 2010.

Evaluate the article
The article is very well written and includes a lot of useful information about Frank Gehry, including his works, his life, and his philosophy. The lead section includes a strong introductory sentence that introduces the topic well touching on his profession, some of his most famous works, and his design style. The content of the page is relevant to the topic of Frank Gehry and his career. The content also covers a large variety of topics from his early life and education, down to his non-architectural designs such as his Wiggle side chair. The page is written in a neutral tone that does not sway the readers point of view in any way. The criticism section of the page includes a neutral view of some of the criticism that Gehry has received. Even though some of the criticism is negative, the writers own point of view does not shine though. There is a very lengthy list of references that back up all the facts on the page, confirming that the information is coming from reliable sources. The images on the page are all cited and there is a good variety of images of his works. Although, I do wish there was a more up-to-date image of Frank Gehry himself. Overall I really enjoyed the article and how in-depth it went about his career.