User:Lexxdavv/Dagaare language/IntrepidError Peer Review

Lead:

- I think more information could be added to the lead to explain to the reader a little bit more information to give.

Content:

- When it comes to grammar and phonology sections, they seem really flushed out especially the grammar section.

- A big think that it lacks could be history, varieties, or its current status.

Tone and Balance:

- As much of the information found on the article mostly just info of about speech its tone is more or less quiet neutral.

Overall a lot more could be added to missing subjects if there are any credible sources that could be found. Still though you added more if not all the information on the phonology section especially the consent and vowel sounds that are made in the language using IPA.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)