User:Lgenn03/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Yellowstone National Park

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have chosen to evaluate this article because it relates to what we are learning about and discussing in class. It is over Yellowstone National Park. It has a strong lead section, sources and references, and the content is strong.

Evaluate the article
The lead section included an introduction sentence that clearly states the topic. The lead is concise, and provides a brief description. The content is relevant, all information is discussing different aspects of Yellowstone National Park. It is up to date since January 25 2022. Content that is missing is information on park rules, climate change, land change, and other important information regarding the debate for how to manage the parks conservation vs preservation. The article is neutral, and unbiased. It is missing information on Natives. However, the article does not try to persuade anyone. All the link I checked worked, and seem to be reliable relevant sources. The article is well written because it does organize the information into different sections that are clear to follow. Several images are included with captions and sources. They are laid out to follow the content of the article and they are visually appealing. There were several good conversations on the talk page. Some included changing images that better represented the National Park. The article can be improved by adding info on environmental issues relating the park and adding native information.