User:Lgenn03/Yellowstone National Park/Rileysteg Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Lgenn03)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lgenn03/Yellowstone_National_Park?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Yellowstone National Park

Content
The content of the article does address Wikipedia's equity gaps. By shining light on the Native Populations of Yellowstone, readers will become informed that the land was not uninhabited before it was declared a national park. The draft also explained lies that were spread to the American public to slander the Native Populations. The content belongs on the article for Yellowstone.

Tone and Balance
I think in general the content is presented in an unbiased way. It lays out the facts and dispels lies that were often spread regarding the inhabitance of the parks before they were claimed nationally.

Sources and References
I see the linked sources at the bottom of the draft, but the individual statements need subscript references to those sources. The sources are all within the last 5 year, meaning the information is probably still relevant. The info contained in the articles is related to the draft, so it seems all of them were used to come up with the statements. All of the links worked and the sources seem to come from a variety of places meaning diverse views were gathered to make the draft.

Overall
The sandbox draft contains great information that I think would make a great addition to the Yellowstone article. I believe this really meets wikipedia's goal of brining more information to light of marginalized communities. The writing could use some working to fix up some minor grammar and flow issues.