User:Lglayman/Intertidal zone/Brontesmithclass Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Lglayman, Luke I think


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lglayman/Intertidal_zone?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intertidal_zone
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intertidal_zone

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?''

Everything Lglayman added to the article was relevant to the topic. It was kind of confusing to have the intertidal zone called the foreshore when spoken about in the legal section, I know it says it is synonymous with ‘intertidal zone’ and ‘seashore’ but that is not Lglayman’s contribution to the article.

''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?''

Nothing seemed biased, very fact based.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

There don’t seem to be many viewpoints in general, just straightforward facts.

''Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?''

There was only one citation added by Lglayman, it worked and supports their claims.

''Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?''

The article is lacking sources, there were only 5 for the entire article. It is not referencing where the majority of information was gathered almost at all. The source from The Guardian does not cite its sources either, making me question its validity beyond its reputation. 2 of the 5 sources are 2004 or older.

''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?''

Given that most of the article is fact based describing intertidal zones I don’t think it is dated. There should be a lot more resources in this article in general, and the Threats section Lglayman added doesn’t really highlight climate change specifically. Will the intertidal zone change with climate change impacts?