User:Lguzman24/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Women Warriors in Literature and Culture

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have chosen this article to evaluate because of the love I have for fictional super heroine women such as Wonder Woman, Scarlett Witch, Black Widow, etc. I particularly want to focus on the literature, film, and television aspect of this article because society needs to become for aware that women super heroines or warrior figures are finally becoming the new pop culture and should continue being society's thriving pop culture. It matters that women thrive as super heroines because it allows women and girls to have this special connection to a character because they look like them, and those characters might have the same problem that a person is going through and this helps them feel motivated to get through it because their favorite female character was able to do it. The first impression I got when seeing this "Women Warriors in Literature and Culture" article, was that it was missing that pop culture aspect of women warriors. I hopefully could contribute to that part of this article.

Evaluate the article
While reading over this article, I noticed that not every fact is referenced with an appropriate and reliable reference. Those that were referenced show pretty reliable references as well as appropriate. Almost everything in the article is relevant to the topic except for the violence section. I feel like that topic was a little distracting to be there because the main idea of this article is to show how women warriors are portrayed in literature and culture and all the subheading talk about folklore and mythology, religion, folk and fairy tales, literature, film, and television, and then theres just violence; that subheading does not really fit in with the rest. This article does appear to be neutral, there are no claims or frames that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. The information comes from other articles or books that are referenced in the article itself. Many seem to be neutral sources, some of the sources introduce bias but it'a not noted in this article. Some viewpoints in the subheading of film and television seems to be underrepresented, that should definitely get its own subheading and be given more information. The links to the citations do work and there is no close paraphrasing nor plagiarism in the article. The information in the article is not out of date but there are new points that could be added to the film and television subheading due to more woman coming out as strong female warrior roles.