User:Lhi1001/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Natural selection

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The discussion is relevant to the research that will be completed further down the line on human sexual selection.

Evaluate the article
The only citation are from other Wikipedia pages, creating a low diversity in source type, potential bias, and sources that may or may not be the most reliable to check on the edited information. The pictures and diagrams are relevant, however I could not easily find if these diagrams and pictures were properly cited. One discussion in the talk page is about the potential to discuss the idea of probability, and how it tie into the idea of natural selection. This article overall is formatted extremely well, and is easy to follow along. After every heading is a link to the article at which the information mostly came from. However, I do feel that the list of articles before each section should have a higher quantity of sources cited, as a way to reduce red flags such as bias to the research. The article appeared to express its idea from a neutral stand point, and as I was reading the article, there was nothing that really stuck out to me as an immediate red flag. However, there was one example of a concept that used the words best known, and that threw me off because in class, we learned that we can not ranking information on a favorbale scale, or on any scale could could be subjective, or left up for interpretation. ~