User:Lhi1001/Mendelian inheritance/Eliseforget Peer Review

General info
Lhi1001
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:(links won't copy)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content:

 * Content added is relevant, I think it was actually very necessary to add the inheritance tools section
 * Maybe put more context into how Mendel used them instead of what they are?
 * for example, how mendel used them in his F1 crosses and what they looked like?
 * you could also provide images from other sources to give a visual explanation
 * maybe add some information to the lead section to outline what the basis of the site is and how it is organized?

Tone:

 * tone is very neutral, informative, descriptive
 * nothing really to be biased in in both the history and inheritance tools, as it is merely facts

Sources:

 * sources 11 and 12 come from non-peer reviewed articles, so maybe try to find another source that says the same thing but is peer reviewed or comes from a book
 * otherwise the sources are all good! good job deciding to add sources to the "History" section, as it was very much lacking actual data to back it up
 * links work