User:Lhorne2024/Jesus Colon/Ellfuentes Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Lhorne2024


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lhorne2024/Jesus Colon


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Does not exist

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * 1) What does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?

In general, I am impressed by the amount of historical context that is provided within the article. More specifically, it includes historical information that provides insight into why Jesus Colón was interested in certain subjects later on in his life. In addition to this, the article also does an excellent job at detailing the various journalist endeavors that Colón participated in throughout his lifetime. This type of information is useful in allowing the reader a layout of the historical figure's career and helping to trace any changes.

2. '''What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?'''

Some changes I might suggest would be to include a more detailed approach to Colón's activist involvement. Moreover, it would be useful for the reader to examine not only Colón's various involvements in the founding of organizations, but also his specific role in some of these. Such content could help the reader gain a better understanding of Colón's influence within these groups and more importantly, the extent of his impact.

Another change I would suggest is to organize the various organizations by which ones Colón invested the most time in. I believe it would improve the article by allowing the reader a structured layout of his life work.

3. What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

Without a doubt, the most important aspect to improving the article would be to include a few more citations in order to provide the aspect of credibility that we discussed in class. Although, I believe the information within the article all has a reliable source. It is all a matter of adding them in to the Wikipedia article. The significance of this sense of legitimacy is especially seen within the description of Colón's early life, such as when he migrated to the United States.

4. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?

As I noticed within the article, there are many references to organizations in which Colón participated. My Wikipedia article also discusses the various organizations that my assigned individual was involved in and I believe it would be immensely useful to include her specific contributions as they pertain to each organization.