User:Lhorne2024/Operation Bootstrap/Valeriebarajas Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Lhorne2024


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lhorne2024/Operation Bootstrap


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Operation Bootstrap

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

In terms of content, I think the sections you added under effects of increased living standards and mass migration are certainly relevant and add important information to that section. The image you added under mass migration fits all the criteria listed above. It makes supports your findings and it is well captioned and positioned in the article. I would say maybe if you could move it and make it bigger so that it is more clear without having to enlarge the image, but even without doing so you can clearly see the significant spike in emigration from Puerto Rico. For organization thus far, everything is well written and clear and I think the way the information is outlined is good. The new content you added is unbiased and backed by a source. All the links that I clicked on worked, but the first thing under External Links looks to be a book or something so I would think it should go under references instead since it's not actually a link?