User:Lhovey2/sandbox

Article Evaluation

 * 1) Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic and is not overly distracting although at times certain parts seem more rushed than anything but it was not overly notable.
 * 2) It seems fairly neutral but there are parts where they do seem to really feed into the consumerism theme of the book and reference it throughout.
 * 3) There does seem to be the issue that it is lacking synopsis it could have been a bit more in-depth compared to what was mentioned.
 * 4) The links do work all though there aren't links for all of them which is an issue because it makes it harder to check them, the ones that do have links do support what they are being used for.
 * 5) Some are neutral sources and journal articles but others are reviews and from magazines which is not credible.
 * 6) None of it is out of date
 * 7) There is lots of conversations on the talk page that focuses on future edits and peer review for the most part.
 * 8) It is rated C-class and is considered mid-importance
 * 9) It is less opinion related and not as in-depth as what we have done in class

Plan of Action for Absalom, Absalom!
I would start by working on creating user friendly tones as some of the terms used in the article are not for those without some basic knowledge. I would also go in and add the characters and more themes and perhaps famous productions of it into the article.

I would also do research on the themes just by checking places like Jstor and seeing what they have on the Absalom, Absalom! and seeing how there might be several different interpretations.

I think separating out the themes and giving them their own space as well as creating a little more user friend reference so that it is easier to find certain themes or charcters would be the big on along with just the tone being used.