User:LiAnna (Wiki Ed)/Psychology handout

''Note from LiAnna: Thanks for being willing to provide input on the psychology handout! Please leave any comments on the talk page or send to me via email at lianna@undefinedwikiedu.org.''

About this handout
This handout will be a single large-sheet, front and back handout, folded in half so it forms four pages of content. It will focus specifically on how student editors in the Wikipedia Education Program in the United States and Canada can contribute successfully to psychology articles on the English Wikipedia. This will be the first of several discipline-specific handouts the Wiki Education Foundation produces, and it will be distributed in printed copies to all students in the psychology area who are participating in our program beginning in the Fall 2014 term.
 * What is it?

The Association for Psychological Science’s Wikipedia Initiative (page on Wikipedia) encourages professors in the United States and Canada to have their students contribute content to the psychology area on Wikipedia. Many of these professors do so by participating in the Wikipedia Education Program in the United States and Canada. We at the Wiki Education Foundation have heard complaints from longtime Wikipedia contributors in the psychology area, student editors, and the instructors involved that psychology is a challenging area for this work, and we want to make the experience better for all parties involved by providing additional guidance specific to student editors writing psychology articles.
 * Why psychology?

Student editors in our program are encouraged to go through the online training and read the Editing Wikipedia brochure.
 * What do student editors already know?

We provide guidance for instructors in the form of an online training, brochures, and assignment design consulting. For psychology instructors, this includes the medical topics training module.
 * What do instructors already know?

Our student surveys show that the single resource they use most is printed guidance — that they won’t necessarily click that link you gave them, but if they have a physical handout on their desk next to them while they work, they will use it. So we’re creating a physical printed resource that’s aimed specifically at student editors, with the most common challenges they face.
 * Why not just link to ?

Title: Editing psychology articles
Editing Wikipedia can be daunting for newbies, especially if you’re a student editor contributing to Wikipedia for the first time as a class assignment. This guide is designed to assist students who have been assigned to write psychology articles on Wikipedia. Here's what other editors in psychology will expect you to know.

You’re editing a resource millions of people use to make personal decisions and to draw conclusions about human behavior and cognition, so it's vitally important to be accurate. Your work is likely to be read by thousands of people. But with great power comes great responsibility!
 * Be accurate

Wikipedia editors in the psychology area have developed additional guidelines to ensure that the content on Wikipedia in this area is scientifically sound. Take extra time to read and understand the guidelines here, then ensure everything you post on Wikipedia meets these requirements. When you post something that doesn’t meet these guidelines, someone will have to clean up after you, costing valuable volunteer time that could have been used to improve content. If you’re not comfortable working under these guidelines, talk to your instructor about an alternative off-wiki assignment.
 * Understand the guidelines

Part of the Wikipedia experience is receiving and responding to feedback from other editors. Do not submit your content on the last day, then leave Wikipedia! Real human volunteers from the Wikipedia community will likely read and respond to it, and it would be polite for you to acknowledge the time they volunteer to polish your work! Everything submitted to Wikipedia is reviewed by multiple, real humans! You may not get a comment, but if you do, please acknowledge it.
 * Engage with editors

You must write things in your own words on Wikipedia. Plagiarizing by copy-and-pasting or close paraphrasing — when most of the words are changed, but the structure and meaning of the original text remains — is against the rules. For a Wikipedia assignment, such plagiarism is a violation of your university’s academic honor code. Cleaning up after plagiarism also takes a tremendous amount of volunteer time that would otherwise go into building Wikipedia. If you plagiarize on Wikipedia, it is extremely likely that you’ll be caught by other editors and there will be a permanent online record of your plagiarism tied to your account. Note that even with standard resources like The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, you cannot copy official descriptions of mental disorders into Wikipedia. You may use direct quotation when it is important to keep the original wording, but be sure to explicitly mark what is being quoted and cite the source.
 * Watch out for close paraphrasing

Have a healthy respect for why these rules exist: Everybody on Wikipedia wants to make the best encyclopedia they can. Take the time to understand the rules, and soon you’ll be contributing to a resource you use daily!
 * Scared? Don’t be!

Page 2: Getting started
Generally, follow these guidelines when determining which psychology article to improve:
 * Choosing an article
 * Choose a topic that isn’t already well-developed on Wikipedia (look for what’s known as “stub” or “start-class” articles — check the talk page for an article’s rating).
 * Choose a topic where there’s a lot of literature in peer-reviewed journals and books about it. Some articles are short because there isn’t enough literature to expand them. Remember that Wikipedia’s sourcing requirements in psychology are strict, and stay away from pseudoscience sources.
 * If you’re not familiar with research literature, you may wish to find interesting sources first, then choose a Wikipedia article to develop.

Every article will be unique, but there are some general sections that readers and other editors will expect to see in your article. Here are three common kinds of psychology articles, and general outlines of sections you should include in your article. You can add, remove, or reorder sections as appropriate for your topic. If you’re writing on a topic not shown here, visit the page Category:GA-Class_psychology_articles for high-quality articles in psychology, and find a related topic to yours to see how those editors have organized their article.
 * Organizing your psychology article


 * An article on a psychologist
 * Lead section
 * Academic career
 * Major contributions
 * Publications
 * Legacy


 * An article on a psychological concept
 * Lead section
 * Context/history of concept
 * Theory and/or experimental evidence
 * Reception/implications


 * An article on a psychological condition
 * Lead section
 * Classification
 * Signs or characteristics
 * Causes
 * Mechanism
 * Management or treatment
 * History (such as early discoveries, historical figures)
 * Society and culture (such as stigma, economics, religious aspects, awareness, legal issues, notable cases)

See also: WP:MEDSECTIONS

The lead section is the most important section of a Wikipedia article, and it takes a particular form. A good lead section will summarize the entire article in 1-4 paragraphs, providing context and briefly covering all of the important aspects of the topic. The first sentence &mdash; which usually starts with the name of the topic in bold &mdash; serves as a definition of the topic and indicates why it is important.
 * [callout connected to the "Lead section" entries of the outlines] What is the Lead section?

One good strategy for writing a Wikipedia article is to draft a lead section first, which you can then use as an outline for the rest of the article. Revise it as you go to make sure it accurately summarizes the body of the article.

Page 3: Using references
For detailed questions about whether a source is okay or not, see WP:MEDRS, but here are general guidelines. If you have a question about whether a source is okay, ask at WP:RSN.


 * Use these sources
 * Secondary sources: These are ones that summarize one or more primary or secondary sources, usually to provide an overview of the current understanding of a medical topic, to make recommendations, or to combine the results of several studies. They include:
 * literature reviews or systematic reviews found in reputable psychological sciences journals
 * academic and professional books written by experts in the relevant field, from a respected publisher


 * Don’t use these sources
 * Primary sources: Avoid citations in which the authors directly participated in the research or documented their personal experiences (treating clients or patients, for example, or studies of lab animals). These include:
 * nearly all papers (aside from review articles) published in scholarly journals
 * Popular press articles
 * Blogs
 * Any other non-peer-reviewed source


 * Cite your sources

You must have the PubMed ID (PMID) or Digital Object Identifier (DOI) for every journal article you cite, or the ISBN and page number of any book you cite. This enables other editors to verify the accuracy of the information you added.

Graphic accompanies this illustrating the wikicode ways of doing this. If you’re using wiki markup:
 * 1) Move your cursor to the end of the first sentence you want to cite that source for.
 * 2) Click the "Cite" tab in the top of the edit box.
 * 3) In the dropdown Templates menu, select “Cite journal” or “Cite book”, as appropriate.
 * 4) Type in the PMID, DOI, or ISBN with the page number/s, and then click on the magnifying glass icon. The cite tool will automatically process the details.
 * 5) Perhaps 5% of the time, the Wikipedia tool will not work. In that case, try putting a DOI into the DOI Wikipedia reference generator at: http://reftag.appspot.com/doiweb.py

To add a citation using VisualEditor:
 * 1) Move your cursor to the end of the block of text you want to cite a source for.
 * 2) Click "Cite" in the toolbar.
 * 3) For a book, add the ISBN. For an online source, add the URL. (There are options for sources with neither an ISBN nor a URL.)
 * 4) Add any other key information, such as the page number(s) for a book, and insert the citation.

Page 4: Writing your article
As you start writing, remember to keep these guidelines in mind:
 * Writing your psychology article
 * Don’t appear to offer psychological advice; you’re writing fact-based descriptions of scientific information.
 * Unlike most school assignments, Wikipedia doesn’t permit original research. A Wikipedia article should cover what the literature says, not your own thesis.
 * Be sure you’re writing fact-based encyclopedic content, not an essay. See the Editing Wikipedia brochure linked from your course page if you need a refresher on the difference in tone.
 * Give appropriate weight to aspects of the topic as the respected literature covers it.
 * Remember, your audience isn’t studying psychology like you are! When mentioning technical terms for the first time, provide a short plain-English explanation in parentheses if possible.


 * Final thoughts
 * Don't procrastinate! Writing scientifically sound Wikipedia articles takes time. Don’t wait until the last minute, but if you get stuck, always ask your instructor for extra time rather than adding content to Wikipedia that doesn’t meet these guidelines.
 * More information on writing medicine-related articles can be found at WP:MEDHOW.
 * If you have additional questions about contributing to Wikipedia, reach out to your Wikipedia Ambassador or post a question at the Teahouse. You can find the Teahouse by entering WP:TH into the search bar.
 * Thanks for your contributions! Your hard work is providing the millions of people who use Wikipedia every day more information about topics that are important to them.

The content and images contained in this publication are available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License v3.0 unless otherwise stated. The trademark of the Wiki Education Foundation is pending registration and Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation used with permission. These marks are not included under the terms of this Creative Commons license. For questions, please email legal@wikimedia.org
 * LEGAL INFO