User:Liam Raviv Patterson/Cape Meares Light/Aiqin314 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Liam Patterson


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Liam_Raviv_Patterson/Cape_Meares_Light&veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template&redirect=no


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cape Meares Light

Evaluate the drafted changes
Your article is definitely very well-structured; you flesh out the original article, and divide it into concise sections that allow for easier understanding and reading of the material. If I were to extend my own article to that length, I would consider following similar parallel structure as applicable to my own topic. More specifically, (a bit nitpicky) I would avoid using a combination of metric and standard for the height of the lighthouse. I think it's good to include that in the side info box, but since you don't include metric conversions for every measurement, it might not be the best idea to convert within the body of the article itself.

Overall, your sources seem pretty reliable. You did use Bryan Penberthy's source a significant amount of times, a total of 11 times. It does seem to be a very reliable source, as Penberthy himself uses several reliable sources in his work. However, on the flip side, the website itself seems to be only run by him, maybe a blog / article blog since he says that he visits them in person, doing research. I tried to do some research on him, and he might be a poet; I'm not actually too clear on that. I personally wouldn't use this website so much throughout my own article, but if you feel that it's reliable enough, I think it might be okay to keep it in your article. But even if you took it out, your article should still meet the 300-400 word limit request as set by Professor Smith.