User:Lifeboatt/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Sustainable architecture

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose this article because it is in my discipline of study.

Evaluate the article
The introduction is concise and gives a quick overview of the subject efficiently. The content of the article is mainly relevant although there are details that it steer a little away from architecture and are more about sustainability in general. There is 'criticism' section that needs work because it was ruled biased by wiki police. There are almost 50 sources for a fairly short article and the sources appear to be trustworthy. The article seems grammatically well written and it easy to read and digest the content. The sections are clear and mainly do relate the area of focus. There a few small images but some sections don't have any pictures. The images present, however, have thorough captions. The talk page is fairly active. It was easy to follow and made me aware of issues that have come up on the page like possible self-promotion that I hadn't noticed before. The article is rated Start-Class and says that more editing is encouraged to enhance the accuracy and thoroughness.

Overall the article is fairly well written but could benefit by including more architecture focused information in addition to all the information about different sustainability practices. There are a good list of sources and an active talk page so the information appears to be reliable.