User:Lifelonglearnerlifelong/Girls Who Code/Jtur0963 Peer Review

General info
@Lifelonlearner
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Lifelonglearnerlifelong/Girls Who Code
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Girls Who Code

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think the edits you have made are great. I saw that you removed information in a few areas that repeated facts previously stated which definitely helps the article flow better and provide new facts throughout. Updating the out-of-date reference is a strong edit too, keeping the article recent and relevant.

In response to your note questioning if the website is a good reference, I think that it is ok to use since some of the information gathered will have to come from the company itself and the best and most accurate place would be the company website. I do not see an issue with it in the areas referenced.

In the History section it references an udpate to the brand. If there is imagery that meets the Wikipedia standards, perhaps that is a place to add some supporting photos.

Overall, your edits are strong and aren't limited to one area. You have updated the flow, references, added language, and raised a valid question about existing references to help make the article better.