User:Lifessojourner/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a  link  to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I initially chose this as the topic that I might contribute to as I have some knowledge of this parasite and the relationship it has with Drosophila m. and symbiosis. It is relevant to the course and the nature of this microbe to host is highly important and nuanced. The article is quite robust and it will be difficult to add information to.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section does not breifly describe the following sections, though it is informative. The article does not appear to be biased or contain fringe assessments or information. The article is neutral in tone. The references seem to be current and reliable. There are some spots that appear to be missing citations, including one in the opening paragraph. Images do serve to benefit the article, though two of them are not necessary to providing good information about the topic. They are credited with appropriate labels. There has been talk about updating and changing language to make the article more correct, specifically relating to the hosts of Wolbachia. And potentially linking it to fictional media, in which this species has been mentioned. This is currently a good article, but could be made better.