User:Lifting world/Ouija/Sweetasy Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Beth.h.blair, Bodmind, Fiona B Howard, Idinptl82, Lifting world, RabiaAkb, Sourdough4444


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes it is, it takes a more scientific approach to the spiritual world. It explains what the movements behind the ouija board are.
 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, the content added was neutral and the tone they took was non-biased.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favour of one position or away from another? No, the content was neutral and was not implying that they were taking one specific side.
 * Is the content added well-written? Yes it was, it was easy to read and understand.And its structure was well done.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? As far as we go, there aren't any spelling mistakes, or grammatical error that was found.
 * Does the article include images that enhances understanding of the topic? They have not added any image yet.


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article? It did make the article more complete, but it isn't enough for that section. It made the article more precise, but not to it's maximum potential.
 * How can the content added be improved? More information could have helped the paragraph. And if they do add more information, the formatting can be a little better.

What could they do better? They could add more references, and more content. Adding more visual pictures, or videos would help others understanding the concept more.

What have they done well so far? The paragraph that they added was well-written, balanced and fits well in the article.