User:Lightfixture13/Arthropod bites and stings/Soupoftheday7 Peer Review

Lead:


 * Introduction sentence is clear and concise.
 * All information in the lead is found elsewhere in the article.

Content:


 * Content added is relevant and is sufficiently up-to-date
 * Your work on diagnosis and treatment makes a much more comprehensive article

Tone:


 * Article is sufficiently factual and neutral. This article is mainly informative, and doesn't appear to contain much information that is contested.

Sources:


 * New material is recent and from acceptable sources
 * One source, "my approach to superficial inflammatory dermatoses" is both old and based on the personal conjecture of two pathologists. However, it does not appear that this source is used extensively and is only used to an extent that it should be considered admissible.

Organization:


 * Missing period at the end of the first sentence of "microscopic appearance"
 * Missing scientific name for mosquitos in table
 * "For example, Japanese encephalitis, Yellow fever, and Dengue fever have FDA-approved vaccines available that may not be appropriate for all patients." is written in a weird passive voice. "there are FDA-approved vaccines for X, Y, Z" may be more fitting of the page's voice.

Images and media:


 * The table looks good and is well organized
 * The map of mosquito ranges does not seem to fit the paper, as it gives a lot space to only one subtype of arthropod. Perhaps having a link to a page that contains that graphic would be better??

Overall:


 * Great additions to this page. It is much more medically relevant now.

~

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)