User:Lightnessofbeing23/La Voix des Femmes (France, 1848)/Madisonave12 Peer Review

General info
User: Lightnessofbeing23
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lightnessofbeing23/La_Voix_des_Femmes_%28France%2C_1848%29
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Voix_des_Femmes_(France,_1848)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: I feel that the Lead is an extremely strong part of the article as it has been updated, includes a strong introductory sentence that clearly describes the article's topic, and is intentional with including information that is presented later on in the article.

Content: The content that has been added is relevant to the topic, is up-to-date, and has made a significant contribution to the article. Providing historical context surrounding the establishment of La Voix des Femmes is an extremely important detail that was initially missed by the first "authors" of this page. Your team did a great job finding this gap of knowledge in the Wikipedia page, as understanding historical contexts invites readers to form a deeper understanding of the material at hand.

Tone and Balance: The content that was added enforces a neutral tone, and does not appear to be heavily biased toward a particular position. Additionally, the content does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

Sources and References: In addition to the links working, all new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information, and accurately reflects what the cited sources say.

Organization: I feel that overall, the article is organized in a clear and concise manner. The content added is well-written and easy to read, and having read through it twice I did not find any grammatical errors.

Images and Media: One suggestion I would make is adding a few visuals to provide readers a clear picture. While I could not find photos of the writers themselves, maybe you could add photographs of the articles they wrote? Or even just a photo of their header? Of course, only add an image if it adheres to Wikipedia's copyright regulations. I am only suggesting it because, as a reader, I like to see an honest picture of what I am reading about rather than envisioning something in my head and later realizing that I imagined was false or incorrect.

Overall Impression: Overall, I really enjoyed reading this article. I found it to be very easy to follow along with, and felt that it maintained a neutral tone throughout. I think there is lots to be proud of in terms of your contributions to this article. Other than adding a visual image to the Wiki page, my only other suggestion would be to consider finding more to add to the "Legacy" section. I say this not because I don't think it's "good enough," but because all the other sections are lengthy, and this one does not keep the length aspect consistent. Again, just a suggestion, I understand if there is not enough new information to add any more.

- Maddie