User:Lights220

I am Lights220 and I enjoy not only reading items on Wikipedia, but occasionally contributing interesting things myself. One of my two contributions was reverted. I didn't caution the reader of my talk about my edit that my words were not to be taken seriously, but figuratively only, and that was my mistake. I was reading the types of things that get reverted by this user, and I noticed that vandalism is typically reverted out by this particular user. Obviously saying that I was completely blown away by something I was reading was misinterpreted as a vandalism type of statement so the user reverted it out. My problem is this, If I am truly impressed by the brilliant scholarship of a fine New Testament translation, what would be the proper way to express that emotion without having my words get deleted? I am not ever going to use the words "completely blown away" again on anything else I do on Wikipedia because those words will get my items reverted as vandalism, that's for sure. http://www.logos.com/products/details/%7B8B788101-7357-4DF9-A1C3-95B82F8A2D64%7D This link is found in the external links portion of two Wikipedia articles.