User:Liizz.bethh/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Feminist sexology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because one of it's main focuses is sexual liberation in the 1960-1970s and in my culture it is seen as a taboo subject. Therefore, it is something I would like to learn more about. It is important to be aware of reproductive rights, sex work, gender roles, etc and how feminist sexologist have ultimately helped women take charge. My first impression is that it will thoroughly explain what a feminist sexologist is all about and what their work focuses on.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section

- Yes, the article does have an introductory sentence that perfectly explains the articles topic.

- Yes, the article includes a brief description of the main sections.

- No, it does not have information that is not present in the article.

- The lead is perfectly detailed.

Content

- Yes, the article does have relevant information about the topic such as male power, sexual violence, and control of the body as they play a big role.

- Yes, it is up to date Information.

- No, all the content in the article are important as it helps to explain female sexology.

- The article does in fact address an underrepresented group, in this case, women.

Tone and Balance

- Yes, it is from a neutral point of view. All explained in an educated level.

- The work does not appear to be biased as it merely gives background information of feminist sexology.

- Each piece of work is perfectly detailed so nothing is overrepresented nor underrepresented.

- Yes, the viewpoints are accurately described.

- No, the article does not try to persuade readers.

Source and References

- Yes, all facts are backed up with reliable sources.

- Yes, they are thorough.

- Since a big part of the subject focuses on the 1960-1970s some of their sources are old but they also included recent pieces of work.

- The articles has included sources of a diverse spectrum of authors.

- I found other good resources that could possibly add more onto the article.

- Some could work as they bring it back to politics and how it was affected.

Organization and writing quality

- Yes, it is well written.

- No, spelling or grammatical errors.

- Yes, it is well written and is broken down with good major points.

Images and Media

- No images but the gender symbol for female. Therefore, I cannot comment as there is nothing to comment.

Talk Page discussion

- Conversation revolve around being able to expand more on the subject.

- It is rated a C-Class.

- They discuss the topic by bringing up influential works, and themes.

- The article is overall pretty good.

- The articles strengths would be explaining thoroughly the three main points.

- It can be improved by adding images to give the article a makeover.

- I think the article is well written but there are minor details I would fix.