User:Likesrocks/The Fable of Fox and Heron/Lightcorot777 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

LikesRocks


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Likesrocks/The Fable of Fox and Heron
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article is very well organized, with proper use of headings and paragraphs. The hyperlinks to other Wikipedia articles are used often and in places where it makes sense to do so. The page is easy to understand and is concise. I would go back and check spelling and tense, before submitting the final draft. You stay at a neutral stance throughout the article.

Maybe it was an issue with my computer, but I couldn't open your seventh source. If you could go back and ensure that it works, it help lower your chances of getting your page taken down or something. In the section about Aesop's fables, it would help readability to add an introductory sentence to your paragraph, explaining what Aesop's Fables are and how prolific they are/were. Or you could add a hyperlink, which could make things even more concise. This could also limit any confusion about the "moral of the story". Your explanation and analysis of the actions in the painting are done well, but I would refrain from using descriptors like "soft" and "gaping" to ensure your neutral stance.

Overall, a very well-rounded article that is easy to read and understand. Can't wait to see where this goes :)