User:Lil Scar II/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(AP United States History)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate because this artilce focuses on United States History in the Advance Placement curriculum and it's one of three areas of study I'm currently doing for my History major.

Evaluate the article
When reading the article, the introduction of the article had a detailed short overview of the what the curriculum is and how it is used. The article does a decent enough job to introduce the reader to the topic without overly detailing it and not containing information that is out of place. I alought the article is quite small, it does two sections being the "Exams" section with it containing a subsection of scores and a section of the refrences of the outside articles or other sources used for this Wikipedia article. The content used does keep the topic relavent as it discusses mainly on the exams and the scores students recieve on the exams in recent years. There are small sections of what textbooks are used for this class and controversies that the class has gotten although these two small section are not the Wikipedia article's main focus. The content used here are mostly of recent years with the most recent being 2023 but no content below the year 2000 with no content seemly not needing to be in the article. There are no equity gaps in this article and none are addressed. The article does have a neutral that is not heavily baised to one side or another with decent presentation of the main focus and a medicore display of the minor sections of the article. No attempts to persuaving a reader to one side. The sources used for the article seem somewhat questionable with some of them being pdfs while other upon clicking redirect to seemlying unreliable sources with the most accurate most likely bieng the graphs presented in the article. Some of the sources in the article could be better for this article. The article is well written no grammaitic or spelling errors and decently organized with the content in the article with its sections. There are no imagines present in the artlcle other the than Wikipedia made graphs. The Talk Page shows the several discussions on how to improve the article with the article being related to other Advance Placement articles. The overall impressions is that it is in good standing with its strengths being good and detailed overview of the content provided by the article. Improvements could be done by referencing better sources for results of the exams from reliable sources and by acedemic sources. The article is below average development as the article is small and may need more content to get a better overview of AP US History and insert pictures of statistics and graphs from academic and reliable sources.