User:Lilac24601/Choose an Article

Option 1: Short Films

 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?


 * The article content is relevant to the topic, it talks about the history of short films


 * Is it written neutrally?


 * Yes, this article is neutral and isn’t opinionated.


 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * No, each claim does not contain a citation. Some passages lack citations or references, and this is something the page needs to improve.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes, most are reliable. However, I am unsure about the last reference.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No, it is a factual representations of what short films are
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * There was a previous image copyright, and most sources did not have proper citation format. People also disagreed with the choice of wording.

Sources

Faber, Liz, and Helen Walters. Animation unlimited: innovative short films since 1940. Laurence King Publishing, 2003.

(shows information about a different category of short film, such as Animation) & gives history, and Liz Faber published the book.

Felando, Cynthia. Discovering short films: The history and style of live-action fiction shorts. Springer, 2015.

(talks about the history of short films) may be able to be added to the history section of the wiki page as there are missing links in the section.

Option 2: Get Out

 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, the article’s content is relevant to the movie and discusses cast, music, and production.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes, it does not seem to be opinionated.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * No, there is not a citation at the end of every claim.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes, the citations are reliable. They are from people in the industry and well-established organizations.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Yes, the article does.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * There is not much discussion on the talk. Seems to be a reliable page. The article was placed in the top 25 Report of the week.

Source

Gus' ap Setiawan, Aan, and Dian Puspita. "TRAUMA ON THE MAIN CHARACTER IN GET OUT MOVIE BY JORDAN PEELE: PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH." Linguistics and Literature Journal 3.1 (2022): 69-78.

Option 3: Short Film: Palme d'Or

 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic. The page is very brief, but up to date.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * yes, it is neutral
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * No, each claim does not contain a citation. But there are a few sources provided.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes, they are reliable. From the organization.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * In terms of short films not being, as widely discussed. It does bring attention to this subject
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Some editors dislike the styling choice that is made by the creator. Questions why the format is bolded.

Source:

https://www.festival-cannes.com/en/the-festival/the-palme-d-or/

(more info on the award) (where it is made etc) (history of its origin)

Option 4: South By Southwest

 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?


 * The article content is relevant to the topic, and discusses the different divisions of the Film Festival, such as music, and artist. (provides a history)


 * Is it written neutrally?


 * Yes, this article is neutral and isn’t opinionated.


 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes, claims contain a citation. There is a substantial amount of sources.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes, they are reliable.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No, I do not believe it is being tackled
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * The cost of the SXSW film festival is being negotiated on the forum.

Sources

https://explore.sxsw.com/hubfs/Hosted%20Files/2022_Economic%20Impact-91422%20FINAL.pdf

(discusses how SXSW benefits Austin, Texas economy)





Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources